AI! On Tuesday, 29 April 2025 at 19:32:48 UTC+3 PGC wrote:
> Give him a break. He advocates consciousness in woke academic settings, in > the hope of one day securing a woke academic job and salary. Every vulgar > post here sabotages his own effort to be taken seriously. Even to future > employers. His country's transition from dictatorship was enabled by years > of woke efforts by his countrymen, woke EU diplomacy, and access to EU > structural funds, that woke Europeans pay taxes for, enabled by woke US > soft power since WW2. > > His very freedom to insult and undermine his name's credibility, his > goals, his project, his acquired standard of living, his education, is all > the result of the very woke efforts he wants to save the world from with > revolutionary ideas that are as common as everybody's personal beliefs. And > if they worked on all the women he claims as conquests, he wouldn't have > time to post nor project his frustration towards every post he replies to > each and every day. > > His drive towards hypermasculine, strong man aesthetics is something he > doesn't have the genetics for. He is "only consciousness exists" but > unhappy with his physical beta appearance. And all the hate and hysteria > just mirrors lack of self-esteem. List members who understand this, can > remind him that voluntary commitment is not something to be ashamed of, and > that the self-hate he sees as necessary is, in fact, not necessary. Or they > can let him post and continue to let him believe that it makes some > positive difference, which he is utterly convinced of. As if anybody's > judgement here on anybody else mattered. > > On Tuesday, April 29, 2025 at 4:08:06 PM UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 29, 2025 at 12:30:43 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote: >> >> Only because you put 2 bricks on top of each other in different positions >> until you find a position in which they dont fall that is not science. Is >> just rqndom guessing until something works. But you have no idea why it >> works. Sure, you can invent theories: it works because that position is >> blessed by Gods. But that is not science. Science is only when you know the >> true reason. >> >> >> You don't know shit. What you offer is the pretention of knowledge. The >> "true reason" of anything is unknown, even in mathematics, and having a >> placeholder for what can be known, in your case "consciousness", is >> worthless. Science is a progression of approximations to truth, a work in >> progress. AG >> >> On Tuesday, 29 April 2025 at 04:26:15 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> On Monday, April 28, 2025 at 8:40:59 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote: >> >> @Alan. You make the classical confusion between science and technology. >> It has the deeper roots of you not understanding the meaning of the word >> "useful". Only because something is useful, it doesn't mean it is true. >> Root canal is useful, but is not science, is just technology. >> >> >> Technology depends on science, crucially in fact. You're the one who has >> no understanding of what you write. Why don't you just STFU? AG >> >> >> On Monday, 28 April 2025 at 17:06:04 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> On Sunday, April 27, 2025 at 2:14:30 PM UTC-6 John Clark wrote: >> >> *I don't understand how those who called themselves futurists can still >> support this man. * >> >> *Trump is gutting what made American science great* >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qk4FBS73Ts&t=20s> >> >> *John K Clark* >> >> >> Johnny one-note continues to waste bandwidth here. Please, let's get rid >> of him and his dumb posts. He thinks science is a religion, but surely uses >> anesthetics for surgery and root canal work. So hypocritical and just plain >> dumb. AG >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f8932d6a-5404-4a3b-ae57-67bc088ecbc7n%40googlegroups.com.
