Low ROI. For cancer my B in law was an oncologist. So I have a rough idea on
that specifality. For me, I would be funding billions specifically like big
pharrma does, but for organ printing got obvious reasons. Say a kidney hasn't
metatticized yet. Rip it out and replace, before chemo is necessary. Also
organ printing would indeed have a very high ROI as well. Pure science hasn't
existed since Penzias and Wilson. Lets have projects and actually get these
achieved.
On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 02:05:31 PM EDT, John Clark
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:42 PM '[email protected]' via Everything List
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Basdic research is the essence of science, but the lead time toi usefulness
>is problematic.
We've been investigating cancer for a long time but we still haven't found a
cure, so are you advising that we give up? Are you advising that the US should
meekly let China take the lead in AI without a fight? And by the way, doesn't
it bother you that you and Trump are on the same side of this issue as a
creature like Cosmin?
> Where's the ROI?
I am absolutely certain that you're looking straight at one of those returns on
investment at this very instant!
John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolistfr
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0g-HA3mkbgzp9h0QodYHiWSw0tFYVg5NJ5O3T8CTZSyw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/761158763.1839117.1745011183754%40mail.yahoo.com.
