All,

I've setup two servers for Feedback Fest. The first one is vanilla Evergreen 3.14 Beta:
https://bugsquash.mobiusconsortium.org/eg/staff
Login: admin / demo123
Postgres 15 and Redis on test server
Enchanced Concerto

The second is Evergreen main (pretty much 3.14), plus the aforementioned Patron edit/search/registration Angular interface patch (Bug 2065344 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/2065344> and Bug
2080438 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/2080438>

It's the same patch as what you can find on the butternut server but this server provides the enhanced concerto dataset as well as i18n languages.

As well as three more patches from Stephanie! sleary++

Bootstrap OPAC: Pending Address Change" Header in the Patron Preferences have not been marked for translation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/2077627

Dynamic staff portal doesn't work well in non-English languages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/2037426

Redirect from AngularJS Login to Angular Staff Portal Page Causes Delays
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1983500


second server accessible here:
https://bugsquash2.mobiusconsortium.org/eg/staff
Login: admin / demo123
Postgres 15 and Redis on test server
Enchanced Concerto

Feedback welcome!

Happy Feedback Fest everyone!

-Blake-
Conducting Magic
Will consume any data format
MOBIUS


On 10/7/2024 4:57 PM, Terran McCanna via Evergreen-general wrote:
I'll also mention that the Angularization of the circulation interfaces has been a work in progress for several years, and the community has tested it at each phase of development on public test servers. The current code has an earlier version of the experimental interface already merged that can be enabled via a library setting on any server, and this updated code will also be controlled by the same settng once it is merged.

Because the circulation interface has so many components, there is no intent to add any new functionality or change any existing behavior.  All of the behavior you see while testing should work exactly as it does in the out-of-support AngularJS code. The differences in the layout are there due to standardization with the rest of the Angular interfaces and components, and to bring them up to current accessibility standards and responsiveness standards. (With enormous thanks to Stephanie and her highly specialized skillset, who is dragging us kicking and screaming into compliance!)

Proposed changes to functionality should be opened as separate bugs outside the scope of this project.

Staff at all levels are highly encouraged to test and report problems, as always.





On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, 5:34 PM Andrea Buntz Neiman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Confirmed, all the intended changes are strictly for the
    Experimental Circ interfaces, which are still not complete and not
    ready for production even with these pending changes.

    I'd like to see these latest pieces merged to get more community
    eyes on it and facilitate the next pieces of work.

    ABN

    On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, 5:20 PM Terran McCanna via Evergreen-general
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        It is only in the experimental stage at this point so needs
        testing to catch bugs, but it will not be the production
        interface until Evergreen 4.0.



        On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, 5:11 PM Lussier, Kathy
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            Hi Terran,

            Thank you for sharing this info, Terran, and for sending
            the link to the test server running this code!

            What a big change to the circulation interfaces!
            Modernizing the circulation interfaces is probably a
            project that is long overdue, and I'm sure there are a lot
            of good UI improvements on top of the accessibility
            improvements. I don't have specific feedback on the
            interface, but I have a question and also a concern
            related to the process for introducing a major UI change
            to Evergreen.

            My question is whether this code is being considered for
            3.14. From my review, it clearly falls in the camp of new
            feature, and, with the beta release already available, my
            understanding is that we should  no longer be introducing
            new features into the release. Am I misunderstanding our
            release policy?

            Here is my concern. As a community, I think we need to do
            a better job of communicating potential major changes to
            the software before coding starts.. By giving the
            community the opportunity to provide feedback at an early
            stage, we can better ensure that these changes are going
            to meet the needs of the majority of libraries using our
            community software. I have this expectation of my
            community partners primarily because, when I first arrived
            in the Evergreen community and started asking questions
            about development, other community members emphatically
            told me that I needed to share my plans early on. I
            listened. When I share NOBLE's plans for a development
            project via the general list, I do so precisely because I
            want to find out if the development is likely to cause
            problems for others using the software. This worked well
            for the last project NOBLE funded. We thought the OPAC
            visible flag should also determine visibility in the staff
            catalog. We asked the question. Other Evergreen libraries
            told us they have use cases for seeing in the staff
            catalog an org unit that is not visible in the public
            catalog. We updated our requirements to incorporate this
            feedback. My hope is that everyone gets what they want
            when that code is eventually merged into the software.

            This update to circulation is a significant change to a
            place in the software that is often used by part-time
            staff. Because they are part time, training can be a
            challenge because there are specific issues they may only
            encounter occasionally, and they need an intuitive way to
            help them address it. Rolling out a major interface change
            will be tricky, and I would like to know that our circ
            experts in this community have had enough time to fully
            engage with this proposed interface and provide feedback
            before it gets merged. I know it will not be forced upon
            people in the next release because it's still in
            experimental mode, but once it gets merged, we've
            essentially made the decision on behalf of the community
            that it is okay for the circulation interface to make this
            shift.

            When I first came on board at NOBLE a little over a year
            ago, we had not performed an upgrade in over a year
            because of another major interface change that lost some
            features our libraries depend upon. We have since upgraded
            with the most critical of these features restored, but I
            know of at least one other consortium that has still held
            off on upgrading. That's what happens when we make major
            overhauls to an interface without adequate community
            feedback in the development at all stages of the
            development process. The new interface may meet the needs
            of a handful of libraries/consortia, but other Evergreen
            libraries then need to make tough decisions about
            upgrading despite a critical feature missing or staying on
            an older release as it moves out of community support.
            Greater community engagement won't fix all of these
            problems, but it goes a long way in mitigating them.

            I heard that the cataloging interest group recently had a
            meeting that included a demo of the interface changes
            introduced to buckets. I think a great next step for this
            project would be a similar presentation for those heavily
            involved in circulation (I don't know if we have an active
            circulation interest group.) Such a demo will ensure that
            more community partners buy into the change to the
            interface and maybe even provide suggestions for making it
            work better for those who work at their circ desk, thereby
            benefiting everyone else in the community who may have a
            similar concern.

            Beyond this project, I would love to see a set of best
            practices for communicating with the community when
            embarking on a development project, particularly when that
            development makes a significant change to people's current
            workflows. I volunteer to work on this and am willing to
            pull something together by myself, but I'm also happy to
            work with others if anyone else wants to incorporate their
            feedback into the best practices. After all, we are a
            community, and I know incorporating everyone's feedback
            into this best practices document will make it better for
            everyone.

            Just my two cents for what it's worth.

            Kathy


            --
            Kathy Lussier
            she/her
            Executive Director
            NOBLE: North of Boston Library Exchange
            Danvers, MA
            978-777-8844 x201
            www.noblenet.org <http://www.noblenet.org>




            On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:07 PM Terran McCanna via
            Evergreen-circ <[email protected]> wrote:


                Hello everyone -

                During Feedback Fest this week, please take a look at
                the updated (Angularized) circulation interfaces that
                are loaded onto
                https://butternut.evergreencatalog.com/eg/staff and
                available through the "Circulation (Experimental)" menu.

                Note that these elements are still missing from the
                new interface because they are not yet complete: Hold
                groups, refresh penalties, display alerts options.

                Also note that the old/current interfaces will still
                be the default in Evergreen 3.14, but the default will
                most likely change to these new interfaces in
                Evergreen 4.0

                Please add any issues you find with the new interfaces
                to the omnibus ticket here:
                https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/2065344

                Thank you!


                logo with link to Georgia Public Library Service
                website <https://georgialibraries.org/>

                        

                Terran McCanna, PINES Program Manager

                
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                Georgia Public Library Service

                2872 Woodcock Blvd, Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30341
                
<https://www.google.com/maps/search/2872+Woodcock+Blvd,+Suite+250+%7C+Atlanta,+GA+30341?entry=gmail&source=g>

                (404) 235-7138 | [email protected]

                https://help.georgialibraries.org |
                [email protected]


                        

                logo with link to Georgia Public Library Service
                Facebook page
                <https://www.facebook.com/georgialibraries>logo with
                link to Georgia Public Library Service Instagram page
                <https://www.instagram.com/georgialibraries/>logo with
                link to Georgia Public Library Service LinkedIn page
                
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/georgia-public-library-service/>logo
                with link to Georgia Public Library Service Threads
                page <https://www.threads.net/@georgialibraries>


                        



                _______________________________________________
                Evergreen-circ mailing list
                [email protected]
                
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-circ

        _______________________________________________
        Evergreen-general mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general


_______________________________________________
Evergreen-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general

Reply via email to