I have seen this work, in my home country of The Netherlands, the
majority of the homes are what we would call townhomes, a block of
about 5 homes built as a single unit with only front doors facing the
sidewalk and possibly the two end homes having a driveway or garage,
so consequently mostly parking in the street required.
For that reason, throughout the country in every city and town, every
few streets a pair of parallel parking slots is marked EV charging and
a small pole is erected on the sidewalk between the two slots. The
pole has a card reader and two EV charging plugs. With the growing EV
population, the number of EV charging spots will grow as well to
accommodate those who cannot rely on charging at work or in the
driveway/garage.
I have also before relayed our story of living in an apartment for a
couple months, where our selection criteria included the ability to
charge my electric truck.
We found an apartment where the manager worked with us, allowing us to
drop a cord from our balcony into the assigned parking slot under the
building (luckily the last slot, next to landscaping, so I could
always tuck the cord away in a non-traffic area when not charging).
That kept my truck charged for several months, besides the ability to
plug into an outdoor outlet at work.
BTW, this is exactly the reason for the recent addition of mandatory
EV charging accommodation in new construction and remodeling.
Cor.

On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 6:30 PM Mark Abramowitz via EV
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Not in L.A..
>
> In California, 50% of the population live in multi-unit housing. How many can 
> reasonably charge at home? I don’t know.
>
> - Mark
>
> Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
>
> > On Oct 23, 2021, at 5:42 PM, Peter VanDerWal via EV <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'll grant you that there might be a few urban drivers that can't charge 
> > at home.
> > However, in big Cities like NY, many(most?) of the urbanites don't have ANY 
> > cars, relying instead on public transportation, taxis, walking, etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > My PGP public key: https://vanderwal.us/evdl_pgp.key
> >
> > October 23, 2021 2:40 PM, "Matthew Pitts via EV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Rural and suburban drivers might have the option to charge at home, and 
> >> there might be businesses
> >> willing to allow employees to charge at work, but for urban EV owners, 
> >> public charging may in fact
> >> be the only option. Just my opinion, though.
> >>
> >> Matthew Pitts
> >>
> >> ⁣Get BlueMail for Android
> >>
> >>> On Oct 23, 2021, 4:28 PM, at 4:28 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV 
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> EV's are charged while parked (usually at home or at work), not at
> >>> public chargers.
> >>> I have a new argument.
> >>>
> >>> Comparing a gas car and EV exclusively limited to public chargi9ng
> >>> could equally be applied to comparing a gas car and EV exclusively
> >>> limited to home refueling. Imagine having to walk to a gas station
> >>> every night to get a few gallons for the tank at home!
> >>>
> >>> Bob
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 2:28 PM Lawrence Rhodes via EV
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> https://amp.freep.com/amp/6110815001 Take onto consideration this is
> >>>
> >>> coming from ICE country in more than one way. I will comment on
> >>> Twitter. Lawrence Rhodes
> >>>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >>>> URL:
> >>>
> >>> <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20211023/ca3f3dd8/attachment.html>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Address messages to [email protected]
> >>>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> >>>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive
> >>>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Address messages to [email protected]
> >>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> >>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive
> >>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> >>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: 
> >> <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20211023/664231f9/attachment.html>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Address messages to [email protected]
> >> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> >> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive
> >> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Address messages to [email protected]
> > No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> > LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to [email protected]
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to