The difference in weight is less than 10 pounds. If what you say is true, is 
that even measurable? Count me skeptical. 

- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On Aug 24, 2021, at 6:01 AM, Willie via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 8/24/21 2:56 AM, Martin WINLOW via EV wrote:
>> Mark: "In pondering what attraction a FCEV might have over a BEV, I hit upon 
>> an
>>>> extremely minor one.  BEVs do not shed mass as they are driven, while
>>>> FCEVs do.  So, FCEVs should see a very slight rise in efficiency as they
>>>> expend their fuel while BEVs do not.  I am NOT claiming that it should
>>>> be a consideration when making buying decisions.  But, since we are
>>>> grasping for straws, it is SOMETHING.”
>> This is only true for ICE vehicles in stop/go (ie urban) driving where you 
>> have to accelerate the mass of the vehicle up to speed and then lose all 
>> that energy braking to a stop again, repeatedly.  On the open road and 
>> sticking to a relatively constant speed, the main force using using energy 
>> is aerodynamic drag (and tyre/road friction plus that of the mechanicals of 
>> the drivetrain).  In an EV, much of the braking in stop/go energy can be 
>> recovered by regenerative braking, thus the ’shed mass’ argument is severely 
>> undermined.  The same applies to hilly terrain.
> 
> 1) I was comparing FCEVs and BEVs.  No consideration of ICE.
> 
> 2) No consideration of energy flows.  Though I believe both FCEVs and BEVs 
> recover kinetic energy via regen.
> 
> 3) To try to be clearer: A FCEV is lighter after it has depleted it's fuel.  
> It has "shed mass".   A BEV is the same weight charged and discharged.  Near 
> the end of the fuel supply, a FCEV is slightly more efficient than when it 
> has a full supply.  A BEV should have the same efficiency when fully charged 
> and near fully discharged.
> 
> Significant?  No.  We are "grasping at straws" for reasons a FCEV might be 
> better than a BEV.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to [email protected]
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to