https://electrek.co/2019/12/21/first-us-porsche-taycan-owner-says-cars-epa-range-is-highly-conservative/
First US Porsche Taycan owner says car’s EPA range is highly conservative
Dec. 21st 2019  Jameson Dow

[image  
https://i1.wp.com/electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/10/479883_taycan_4s_2019_porsche_ag_1-e1571041710361.jpeg


shares
https://twitter.com/greg_wyler/status/1208073472792027138
Greg Wyler  @greg_wyler · Dec 19, 2019
Thank you .@Porsche and .@HerbChambersCo  for the new Taycan Turbo S. Just
in time for 🎄! The interior fit and finish is total Porsche quality and
super comfortable. Can’t wait to drive it tomorrow! @PTaycan
View image on Twitter

Greg Wyler  @greg_wyler
Quick Drive Report: This car is a quiet monster. Totally docile, but if you
press the throttle and start turning it will rip your insides apart with
acceleration and g forces. Best car I have ever driven hands down.
View image on Twitter
11:15 AM - Dec 20, 2019


https://twitter.com/greg_wyler/status/1208221352139862016
Greg Wyler  @greg_wyler · Dec 20, 2019
Replying to @greg_wyler
Quick Drive Report: This car is a quiet monster. Totally docile, but if you
press the throttle and start turning it will rip your insides apart with
acceleration and g forces. Best car I have ever driven hands down.
View image on Twitter

Greg Wyler  @greg_wyler
End of day - heading home.  Car to be shipped to me. 117 fun miles,26 deg
temp,used 46% battery. Heat- impressive/quick. Full main screen map-well
done. Outside car safety noise-Lukes landspeeder. Enormous amount of thought
went into this car. Congrats @Porsche!
9:03 PM - Dec 20, 2019
]

Porsche has started deliveries of the Taycan in the US, just in time for
Christmas. And the first US Taycan owner has given his first “drive report,”
and it’s pretty much all positive.

Of particular note, he states that the car’s 201-mile estimated EPA range,
and commensurate low efficiency, is “conservative.”

Greg Wyler is founder and chairman of OneWeb, a satellite internet access
company. He took delivery of his Porsche Taycan in Massachusetts on
Thursday, becoming the first US customer, as far as we know.

Wyler gave some of his first impressions of the car on Twitter. He was
impressed by the quality of the interior fit and finish and called the car a
“quiet monster,” saying it is the “best car I have ever driven, hands down.”

None of this is particularly surprising — we’ve heard lots of good things
about the drive experience and build quality of the Porsche. We would expect
that a Porsche would be built and drive well, we just haven’t experienced it
for ourselves yet (hint hint, Porsche).

The most notable report Wyler made, though, is about the Taycan’s
efficiency.  The car’s EPA rating came out recently and was disappointingly
low, with just 201 miles of range. That rating was for the Turbo, and Wyler
has the Turbo S. The Turbo S is not yet rated by the EPA but has even lower
efficiency than the Turbo, according to EU WLTP ratings.

201 miles is more than enough for the vast majority of people, especially
when paired with the Taycan’s promised ability to charge at 350 kW. But this
number meant the Porsche Taycan is rated as the least efficient electric car
currently being sold in the US. Low efficiency makes a car worse in lots of
ways, not just in terms of range.

Wyler’s experience suggests that that rating is highly conservative. He
drove the car in not particularly ideal conditions — cold weather and
spirited driving — and still only used 46% of the battery to go 117 miles.

If we extrapolate this data, this would give the Taycan 254 miles of total
range, even in poor conditions. This is before accounting for any amount of
the battery Porsche is holding back to protect against degradation.

And if we apply the same calculation to the car’s efficiency, we get 87 mpge
rather than the rated 69 mpge. This is roughly in line with some of Tesla’s
earlier Model S numbers — the original 2012 Model S was rated at 89 mpge.

Of course, this is one drive report from one owner in one set of road
conditions. And Wyler did not drive the car all the way until empty, so we
don’t know where the bottom end of the battery is. It’s even possible that
the range display could have been calibrated a little off — this happens
sometimes with battery gauges on new products (though that applies more to
cheap battery powered products, not to something as well-engineered as a
car).

So we can’t go out and say the car is suddenly an efficiency king yet. But
it does, at least, look likely to be a bit better than the ratings suggest.
Which is nice, since the rating is rather abysmal.

Now that the floodgates are opening on deliveries, we suspect we’ll be
hearing more owner reports soon and start to get a sense of what the car
really has going for it.
[© electrek.co]


+
https://thenewswheel.com/4-best-chevrolet-vehicles-for-commuters/
4 Best Chevrolet Vehicles for Commuters
December 16, 2019 ... 2020 Chevrolet Bolt EV  If you have a long commute,
the price of gas can be a concern. Choosing an electric vehicle like the
Chevy Bolt EV means you don’t need to think about the price of gas anymore.
The 2020 Bolt has a range of 259 miles on a full charge, which is more than
enough to cover most commutes (and means you probably won’t even need to
charge it every day). The Driver Information Center tells you how many miles
you have left on your charge, as well as information about how your energy
is being used, your efficiency history, and how things like driving
technique and outside temperature affect your battery use ...
https://thenewswheel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2020-Chevrolet-BoltEV-001-760x506.jpg




For EVLN EV-newswire posts use:
 http://www.evdl.org/archive/


{brucedp.neocities.org}

--
Sent from: http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html
INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to