One thing led to this Tesla Model 3 auto sales. Problem is there is still a 
problem driving any of these cars on a trip. Nowhere to charge it.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 20, 2019, at 7:24 AM, moskowitz via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> https://www.designnews.com/electronics-test/mainstream-automakers-embark-on-big-move-battery-electrics/94422093060984
> -----
> 
> Mainstream Automakers Embark on the Big Move to Battery-Electrics
> 
> Despite anemic sales and despite losing money on every battery-electric 
> vehicle they sell, mainstream automakers are forging ahead. Here’s why, and 
> here’s what’s needed for them to be successful.
> 
> By: [Charles Murray](https://www.designnews.com/author/charles-murray)
> 
> [Electronics & Test](https://www.designnews.com/electronics-test)
> 
> [Automotive](https://www.designnews.com/automotive-0)
> 
> June 18, 2019
> 
> [Photo] Later this year, Ford is expected to unveil a Mustang-inspired 
> crossover with an all-electric range of 300-plus miles. (Image source: Ford 
> Motor Co.) 
> 
> After more than a century of rejecting battery-powered cars, mainstream 
> automakers are finally changing their minds.
> 
> This year, they’re debuting some of the best battery-electric vehicles (BEV) 
> in their history. The cars are big and visually appealing; feature long-range 
> batteries; and come in popular form factors – crossovers and SUVs. In short, 
> they’re built to sell. And their underlying message is clear: These aren’t 
> your regulator’s electric cars.
> 
> Moreover, the new breed of battery-electrics is being developed by some of 
> the global industry’s most established, mainstream names. In the first half 
> of 2019 alone, Audi, Hyundai, Jaguar, Kia, and Nissan debuted new BEVs with 
> 200-plus-mile ranges. Later this year, Porsche will deliver a 600-HP, 
> all-electric luxury vehicle. And Ford Motor Co. will reveal an electric, 
> Mustang-inspired crossover that Ford chairman William Clay Ford has said will 
> “go like hell.”
> 
> And the trend will extend well beyond 2019. General Motors has said it will 
> introduce more than 20 new BEVs over the next few years, including a 
> battery-powered Cadillac. And Fiat Chrysler is planning to offer four new 
> electric Jeeps, while Ford is working on an all-electric version of the F-150 
> pickup. Meanwhile, Volkswagen is said to be investing $50 billion in 
> electrification technology.
> 
> All in all, it amounts to a bonanza of BEVs. “It’s still a small fraction of 
> the market,” said Sam Abuelsamid, principal analyst for Navigant Research. 
> “But it’s definitely growing fast.”
> 
> Even as the market grows, however, mainstream manufacturers have a quiet but 
> very real concern – the consumer. “The auto companies want to be committed, 
> and they think what they’re doing is a good idea,” noted Mike Ramsey, senior 
> director and automotive analyst for Gartner, Inc. “But they definitely need 
> to see some market pull.”
> 
> Indeed, there’s still reason for concern on that front, despite the rollout 
> of so many products. Last year’s US BEV sales amounted to only about 1.5% of 
> the market, mostly because the vehicle prices are still higher than those of 
> comparable gas-burning cars.
> 
> And that’s frightening for automakers who have already poured billions of 
> dollars into development of new BEVs. Many fear they will over-produce. They 
> imagine parking lots full of unsold, deeply-discounted, electric cars – and 
> deep financial losses. 
> 
> For mainstream automakers, it’s a risk they take as they dive head-long into 
> the electric fray. And they know it. “There is no demand,” one automotive 
> OEM, who preferred to remain anonymous, lamented to Design News .
> 
> Still, it’s the reality. “The customer is in charge of the game,” noted David 
> Cole, chairman emeritus of the Center for Automotive Research and a 60-year 
> veteran of the auto industry. “And no one knows what the customer will do.”
> 
> The Reasons Why
> 
> A confluence of factors – including global competition, government 
> regulations, and falling battery prices – have brought mainstream automakers 
> to this juncture.
> 
> It’s a juncture that many automakers couldn’t have imagined a decade ago. 
> Most had been more notable for their tepid acceptance of battery-electric 
> vehicles and, in some cases, outright refusal to build or sell them.  
> 
> But for almost every mainstream manufacturer today, regulations have become a 
> forcing factor. In the US, California and 14 other states have taken the 
> lead, calling on automakers to hit prescribed percentages of zero emission 
> vehicles (ZEV). If they don’t, there are penalties to be paid in the form of 
> ZEV credits. Such credits can cost tens of millions of dollars, and end up 
> getting paid to competitors, which most manufacturers are loathe to do.
> 
> Then there’s the global market. Most observers say the global market is the 
> biggest motivator of all. At least 17 countries have announced plans to ban 
> internal combustion engines in city centers, mostly between 2030 and 2040. 
> And China has made battery-electric vehicles a national priority, even going 
> so far as to require that customers enter a lottery in order to get a license 
> for a new car with an internal combustion engine.
> 
> For automakers, the handwriting is on the global wall. “When you’ve got 
> Europe and China and California holding a gun to your head and telling you to 
> sell EVs, then you’re going to sell EVs,” noted Abuelsamid of Navigant 
> Research. “If you want to be part of the global market, then you just have to 
> do this.”
> 
> That’s why many of the aforementioned BEVs won’t be sold in the US. GM, for 
> example, has talked about more than 20 BEVs, many of which are ticketed for 
> China, Abuelsamid said. Ford has discussed as many as 14 different BEVs, of 
> which only six will be offered in the US, and FCA’s electric Jeeps are 
> targeted for other countries, he added.
> 
> Some automakers are unhappy about the mandates, but have little choice. “This 
> is more of a forced march than a happy migration,” one foreign manufacturer 
> wrote to Design News.
> 
> Others, such as GM, have concluded that if they have to build EVs globally, 
> they might as well call for a national EV mandate in the US. That way, they 
> can spread the cost of their massive BEV development efforts.
> 
> Either way, they want to be careful not to build too much, for fear US 
> consumers won’t bite. It’s an especially difficult calculation, given the 
> fact that virtually every automaker is losing money on every BEV it sells. 
> “It’s really hard to make a business case for something that you know will 
> lose money for an extended period of time,” Abuelsamid said. “So everybody 
> aside from Tesla is trying to limit their sales to what they need to do in 
> order to meet the mandates.”
> 
> Better Batteries
> 
> Having been pushed to build EVs, however, automakers in recent years have 
> begun to make a curiously pleasant discovery: There's light at the end of 
> that long, dark, development tunnel. And that light is the lithium-ion 
> battery.
> 
> Lithium-ion batteries have come a long way since a decade ago, when the 
> National Academy of Engineering estimated that they were costing OEMs more 
> than $1,000/kWh (at $1,000/kWh, an 85 kWh battery would have cost $85,000). 
> Today, most experts believe that the figure is under $200/kWh, and in many 
> cases, around $150. Moreover, that’s a pack cost, including not only the 
> lithium-ion cells, but the modules, cabling, and cooling systems, as well.
> 
> And still, the numbers appear to be dropping. For the first time since the 
> U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium set a goal of $100/kWh more than two decades 
> ago, some automakers believe that figure may be in sight, said Cole of the 
> Center for Automotive Research. “There’s at least one company that’s 
> enthusiastic about it,” he told Design News. “In fact, they believe they can 
> go well below that number, which would give them a huge competitive 
> advantage.” If that’s true, then automakers could finally put EV costs on a 
> par with those of internal combustion-based vehicles, Cole added.
> 
> Even today, some OEMs are finding that they can get volume discounts from 
> lithium suppliers if they can scale up their production. “We’re seeing that 
> the cost of a battery is about 40% of what it was six years ago,” Mike 
> Duhaime, head of electrification architecture and technology at Fiat 
> Chrysler, told Design News. “We’re almost at a point where battery-electrics 
> are on a par with plug-in hybrids in terms of cost.”
> 
> Moreover, energy density is up, which means that automakers can also squeeze 
> more range out of a BEV. “The battery technology of five, six, eight years 
> ago got us 100 or 150 miles of range,” Duhaime said. “Today with the new 
> battery technologies and the new electronics, we’re seeing 300 miles.”
> 
> A New Optimism
> 
> For some automakers, the battery improvements are translating to real 
> optimism. Ford, for example, now believes that electric vehicles can succeed 
> in their own right. “There’s an opportunity to be margin-positive here – to 
> have profitability on battery-electrics,” Ted Cannis, global director of 
> electrification for Ford Motor Co., told us.
> 
> For Ford, such thinking represents a major strategy shift. Only eight years 
> ago, the company rolled out the Ford Focus Electric, a hatchback with a tiny 
> 23 kWh battery and a meager 76-mile driving range. Sales were disappointing, 
> but not unexpected. In retrospect, Cannis said, their approach was 
> understandable, given the cost, the limited capabilities of the time, and the 
> knowledge that they would be losing money. “Part of the thinking was, ‘it’s a 
> compliance play,’” he said.
> 
> Now, however, that’s changed. For the as-yet-unnamed BEV that will be 
> unveiled late this year, Ford engineers have taken a different tack. They 
> built atop the Mustang name, added a big battery with a 300-mile range, 
> employed a popular crossover form factor, and trotted out their chairman to 
> let the world know that the new vehicle would “go like hell.” 
> 
> [Photo] The first model on GM’s new EV platform will be a Cadillac. GM says 
> the new platform will allow engineers to quickly respond to customer 
> preferences with a relatively short development time. (Image source: Cadillac)
> 
> “We had a couple of key principles,” Cannis said. “We decided we would 
> leverage our iconic vehicles – the ones that brought us to the party. This is 
> the strength of our brand around the world, where we have the greatest 
> loyalty, and where we have the greatest connection to our customers. That’s 
> been key.”
> 
> Ford is also tailoring its vehicle design to the manufacturing process, 
> paying special attention to such matters as how the battery is placed in the 
> vehicle. And it’s focusing on the EV “eco-system,” including charging 
> infrastructure and customer experience, all of which is important to 
> tech-savvy EV consumers, Cannis said.
> 
> Such consumer focus is key for virtually every mainstream EV maker today. The 
> result is that manufacturers are suddenly getting good grades for their 
> efforts. Jaguar’s new I-Pace won European Car of the Year, the first Jaguar 
> to capture the award in its 50-year history. Also, the Hyundai Kona Electric 
> and Kia Niro EV have received high praise for offering driving ranges of more 
> than 250 miles at relatively low starting prices.
> 
> [Photo] Hyundai’s Kona Electric offers a 258-mile all-electric range for a 
> starting price of $36,850. (Image source: Hyundai) 
> 
> Couple that new breed of vehicles with more fast-charge stations, and the 
> future begins to look even rosier, manufacturers say. “Now, the EV becomes 
> more of a primary-use, rather than a secondary-use, vehicle,” said Duhaime of 
> Fiat Chrysler.  
> 
> Inspired by Tesla
> 
> Industry analysts credit Tesla with providing part of the inspiration for 
> such changes in mainstream thinking. Tesla, they say, showed there was a 
> willing market for EVs by making an honest effort to appeal to buyers. Their 
> vehicles offered long range and smart styling, along with great safety 
> ratings and stellar acceleration and handling. The result was powerful 
> word-of-mouth and an incredible international media buzz surrounding its 
> vehicles.
> 
> “In the past, the theory was that only hard-core environmentalists would want 
> to pay the premium for these vehicles,” Abuelsamid said. “They were just too 
> expensive. But Tesla showed that these cars can appeal on their own merit, 
> and that’s been a huge boon to all EVs.”
> 
> The question now is how big the EV market really is. US sales of BEVs this 
> year aren’t much better than 2018, and Tesla appears unlikely to come close 
> to the goals that it set for itself. The company’s mainstay – the Model 3 EV 
> – posted sales of 25,000 units in December, then dropped to 6,500 in January 
> after a $7,500 government tax credit for buyers was cut in half. Although 
> sales have rebounded slightly, the company’s stock nose dived from $385 a 
> share to less than $180 a share in a space of four months. In June, The New 
> York Times questioned whether Tesla would ever be more than a niche player.
> 
> Skeptics worry that it’s taking too long for BEVs to make money. Amazon, they 
> say, went through similarly dark, unprofitable days, when consumers balked at 
> its business model. But the electric car re-boot began years before Amazon 
> was launched, and now Amazon is a giant, whereas electric cars continue to 
> struggle, they say.
> 
> To be sure, most studies suggest that BEVs will keep gaining share over time. 
> Bloomberg’s Electric Vehicle Outlook 2017 predicted that 54% of new car sales 
> and 33% of the global car fleet would be electric by 2040. The question, 
> however, is whether mainstreamers and startups can keep investing in the 
> technology until the numbers rise.
> 
> Industry experts say that the winners in the BEV space may be the companies 
> with the wherewithal to outlast the others. Cole of the Center for Automotive 
> Research believes the OEM market will ultimately be defined along the lines 
> of the “haves” and “have-nots.”  The “haves,” he said, are more likely to be 
> able to make the continued investment that’s necessary for BEVs to compete 
> with gasoline-powered vehicles, especially in the mid- and entry-level 
> markets.
> 
> “The ‘haves’ are looking at autonomy, mobility, and electrification, and it’s 
> unclear to them what’s going to happen,” Cole said. “They admit they don’t 
> know. But they’ll have the ability to stay in the game, and maybe even get a 
> competitive advantage, whereas the ‘have-nots’ will have to find a partner – 
> somebody who can help them do it.”
> 
> Still, mainstream automakers are more committed than ever, and are likely to 
> keep investing in the technology, as long as governments continue to push and 
> battery costs continue to fall. If the market is ready, they say, then 
> they’re ready.
> 
> For that reason, a willing consumer will be the key. “Up to now, economics 
> have been shoved aside in the debate over electrification, at least at the 
> public level,” Cole said. “But consumers will have their say, and economics 
> will ultimately be the deciding factor.”
> 
> ---
> Senior technical editor Chuck Murray has been writing about technology for 35 
> years. He joined Design News in 1987, and has covered electronics, 
> automation, fluid power, and auto.
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to