Could be, but I don't think anyone has brought up that theory before. That would mean that people who charge and discharge between 80% to 60% should see significant degradation whereas those who discharge to 20% should not. Can anyone corroborate that?

Peri

------ Original Message ------
From: "Thos True" <[email protected]>
To: "Peri Hartman" <[email protected]>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[email protected]>
Sent: 05-Oct-16 8:10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] To fully charge or not to fully charge that isthequestion

Peri,

My thinking on the degradation has to do with the fact that most people do not actually discharge the cells below 50 or 60 percent. I learned from some of the people involved with the lithium cells that it is best to think of them as a "sponge". That is, if you leave a sponge soaking in a bucket, it rots very quickly (always plugged in or charged), and if you leave it on a shelf all the time, it becomes very hard, and takes a very long time to re-hydrate (prolonged low charge). However is you wring it out on a regular basis, lasts for a very long time (regular full charges and discharges). This is why it was recommended to fully discharge ie. wring out (according to the instrumentation) once per month.
I know that it worked well for me.

-Tom

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Peri Hartman via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
Something doesn't make sense, here. No doubt you prolonged the battery capacity by not charging and discharging fully, per the engineer's advice.

But according to what others have said, if you consistently charge to 80% and discharge to 20%, you should see very little or no capacity degradation with LiFePos. Yet the vast majority of Leaf owners do see significant degradation and never see thermal runaway.

So, either LiFePos need even a smaller margin of operation, say 35% to 65%, or what the engineer told you isn't completely true. Or there's some other significant factor in the situation.

Peri

------ Original Message ------
From: "Thos True via EV" <[email protected]>
To: "Cor van de Water" <[email protected]>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[email protected]>
Sent: 05-Oct-16 7:00:20 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] To fully charge or not to fully charge that isthequestion

I'm not sure why this keeps coming back to roost. Some people on this list
may recall the same conversation back in the spring of 2011, where I
contacted Nissan about the 80% issue. I received a phone call from one of the engineers in Tennessee. He understood my confusion and expressed some
frustration at their end, explaining that they designed the on board
battery management system to protect the batteries. Doing so by never
letting the batteries charge above 80% (which shows as the full 100% on the instrumentation), and never discharging below 20% (which shows as 0%).
Explaining that if you let the battery pack get below 10%, it would
typically brick (not allow a charge), and above 90%, that your could
experience a thermal even ( Thermal runaway & fire).
The final recommendation from him was to discharge the pack to 10 miles or so in range (according to the instrumentation), and fully recharge about once a month to "refresh" the battery. I followed his advice, and after 39 months and 56,000 miles, (the end of the lease), the pack was still above
98% capacity, which seemed to surprise the service department at the
dealership where we turned it in at.
I suspect that some of the degradation that we experienced may have been due to some of the fast chargers that we used toward the end of the lease,
but have no way to be sure of that.

Tom True

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Cor van de Water via EV <[email protected]>
wrote:

 Let's try that *with* the link:
https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/29/tales-from-a-tesla-model-s-at-200k-mil
 es/


 Cor van de Water
 Chief Scientist
 Proxim Wireless

 office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water
 XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info

 http://www.proxim.com

This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation. If you received
 this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
 this message is prohibited.


 -----Original Message-----
 From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cor van de
 Water via EV
 Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 11:28 PM
 To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] To fully charge or not to fully charge that
 isthequestion

 Here is the article about the 200k mi Tesla (in 1 year) Note that
Tesloop is actually aiming at putting 400k mi on their cars each year,
 so the 8 year warranty on battery and drivetrain would give them ~3
 million miles under warranty...
Their website has a blog with a few of the details, including an early
 front motor replacement under warranty.

 Cor van de Water
 Chief Scientist
 Proxim Wireless

 office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water
 XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info

 http://www.proxim.com

This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation. If you received
 this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
 this message is prohibited.


 -----Original Message-----
 From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cor van de
 Water via EV
 Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 2:06 PM
 To: Willie2; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] To fully charge or not to fully charge that is
 thequestion

 Willie,
 Not dynamically, just a one-time upgrade (dealer visit required).
Many Leaf owners who lost the 4th bar and thought they qualified for the
 warranty battery replacement were miffed to see the dealer really
enforcing the Nissan requirement that the warranty will only be honored after the mandatory re-calibration of the 12 battery bar gauge. Most owners found out that after re-calibration their earlier 4 bar loser no longer showed 4 bars lost so they no longer qualified unless they would again see 4 bars lost on the re-calibrated gauge. The first bar does not disappear until 15% is lost and each subsequent bar should stand for
 6.25% so in theory you need a battery degraded to just over 66% of
 nominal capacity to qualify if the gauge will indeed drop to 4 bars
right at that point. But reports I have seen of Ah capacity degradation
 suggest that the loss of the 4th bar happens later.
I found it significant that Leafs can lose more than 40% capacity in
 about 50k mi while some Tesla drops only 6% in 200k mi.

Of course this is only one sample with a specific usage pattern, but I highly doubt an expansion of the samples will give different results,
 we'll see.

 Cor van de Water
 Chief Scientist
 Proxim Wireless

 office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water
 XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info

 http://www.proxim.com

This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation. If you received
 this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
 this message is prohibited.


 -----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Willie2 via EV
 Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 11:18 AM
 To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] To fully charge or not to fully charge that is the
 question

 On 10/04/2016 12:29 PM, Cor van de Water via EV wrote:
> on the battery as the Leaf *does* degrade its battery by 40% to approx

> 60% capacity in approx 50k mi in warmer climates (that is the point > where Nissan gives a warranty battery replacement, even though they > promised 70% but re-calibated the battery to lose the 4th bar around
 60%
> capacity and triggering the warranty if it occurs within the warranty
 > limits for time and mileage.)
 When I first got my Leaf, I was astonished at how crappy the
instrumentation is/was. Coming from the conversion world, I expected to

see, or find out, how much energy went into the battery and how much came out. Instead, I had these twelve "bars". Unacceptable granularity.
 Later, I found the "bars" were not even of equal value.
After some pondering, I came to the conclusion that Nissan did things in

 that way to hide information from their customers.  What other
 explanation could there be?

Even more astonishing is how Leaf owners accept the situation and speak of almost meaningless "bars". I'm not surprised to learn that Nissan
 dynamically recalibrates "bars" to manage their warranty threshold.

 _______________________________________________
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag
 racing at NEDRA
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

 _______________________________________________
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag
 racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

 _______________________________________________
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag
 racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

 _______________________________________________
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
 Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/
 group/NEDRA)




--
Remember, it is not that the glass is half empty, in reality, the glass is
merely twice the size that it needs to be! -TNT'82
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20161005/594baeca/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)




--
Remember, it is not that the glass is half empty, in reality, the glass is merely twice the size that it needs to be! -TNT'82
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20161005/5dc9924d/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to