That is also why every L3 location should have an equal number of L2
stations, so that *if* somehow the fast chargers are
blocked/down/whatever
*or* for the drivers that need more than 80% charge, they can terminate
the fast charge session when they get throttled back enough that it
makes no sense to continue hog (and pay) for the L3 and move over to the
L2 to go from 80 to 100% which should take another half hour to an hour
at full L2 capability (L3 will not be faster as the BMS will throttle
charging speed back to protect the cells from overvoltage anyway). If
the L3 is down and someone arrives on "fumes" from his battery (turtle)
then at least he can sip from L2 until he can make it to the next L3
instead of being stranded...

Cor van de Water 
Chief Scientist 
Proxim Wireless 
  
office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water 
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info 

http://www.proxim.com

This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
this message is prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Rees via
EV
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 8:12 PM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Lawrence's L3 25kW CHAdeMO network on I-5 in CA

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 6:58 PM, brucedp5 via EV <[email protected]>
wrote:
> IMO, L3 should be ~50mi apart. This is for several reasons:
> - Short range EVs can use it (i.e.: iMiev)
>
> - as packs age their capacitiy is reduced, so even a tired (less than
90mi)
> Leaf pack charging from 10% to 80% (70% or 90mi = ~60mi) could utilize
the
> L3 EVSE.
>
> - when the weather is cold, non/less thermally controlled packs will
have
> less range, so keeping the distance between L3 EVSE ~50mi will still
work
> for them

At least for my 2011 LEAF with 8 capacity bars remaining, 50 miles is
way too far apart.

An 80% charge only takes me about 30 miles to LBW. To turtle I might
have another 12 miles more. This is while driving at 65mph in good
weather.

If it were cold, wet or windy, it'd be even less.

So IMO, 25-30 miles apart would be better (funny enough, this is
typically about how far apart gas stations in rural areas)
For EVs with more range, they would be able to skip locations.

Tesla has started doing something interesting with their network.
Instead of evenly spreading out stations to add capacity, they have
started putting pairs of stations within a few miles together. IMO,
this makes a lot of sense. That way if one is counting on getting to a
charging station, but for some reason that station is down, busy or
whatever, they should almost certainly make it to the next one a
couple miles down the road.

Dave
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to