I re-read the original mentioning of the 40Ah cells that also said
that he paid $5k for 95 cells. That is about right, the CALB were
typically going for $1.25 per Ah so that means that he really is using
24 sets of 4 *in series* since that gives the roughly 300V that is expected.
I suspect that his 90 miles range is incorrect, or it may be "up to" 90 mi
which can only be achieved by driving constant 30 MPH for 3 hours straight.
Since he has 40Ah cells and the sporty acceleration needs more than 200A,
he is loading his cells with more than 5C and that is outside the spec
for the cells, as far as I know, so I think that the worry about the
longevity of the cells is valid.

Cor van de Water
Chief Scientist
Proxim Wireless

office +1 408 383 7626          Skype: cor_van_de_water
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130          private: cvandewater.info
www.proxim.com


This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and 
proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received this 
message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any unauthorized 
use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of this message is 
prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cor van de Water via EV
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:41 AM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EV Digest, Vol 32, Issue 18

Hi David,
Something is not correct in the numbers that you give us.
If there are 24 modules of 4 parallel cells, then the pack voltage is about 77V 
(24 x 3.2V) which makes no sense in a 300V vehicle, so I suspect that there 
still are 96 series cells.

The 40Ah is incapable of giving the truck a spiffy acceleration because typical 
for this type of vehicle is at minimum 250A current limit (which is what my US 
Electricar S10 truck had and it is similar to the Ranger) and since the 
recommended max draw on these batteries is 3C the 40Ah cell would need to be 
limited to 120A so my guess is that there are 2x 40Ah cell in parallel or there 
actually are 80Ah cells in use, but size constraints may have made 40Ah 
necessary and they are buddy-paired, but still 96 cells in series.
That would give a total max pack capacity of 24.6 kWh and at a typical 
consumption of 300 Wh per mile for a truck, that gives 82 miles of range. Drive 
it careful
(slower) and you can get up to 90 miles of range in practice.
That would mean that a total of 192 cells of 40Ah capacity are used.
As I said before - it makes more sense to use the 80Ah cells (half the 
terminals to connect) but of course I do not know the reason to select 40Ah.

Cor van de Water
Chief Scientist
Proxim Wireless

office +1 408 383 7626          Skype: cor_van_de_water
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130          private: cvandewater.info
www.proxim.com


This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and 
proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received this 
message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any unauthorized 
use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of this message is 
prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Miller via EV
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 9:38 AM
To: Alan Arrison
Cc: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EV Digest, Vol 32, Issue 18

 Hi Alan.
  Thanks for the insight!

  I do worry about the batteries.  It's not my Li conversion.
So, I'm short on many details.  Here is what I know.

  It ranges 90 miles per charge under easy use.  45 miles per charge when 
driven aggressively.
  The 40 AH Lithiums are packed into 24 4-cell parallel modules.
So, these modules are 160 AH with 1/4 of the total current flowing through each 
cell?
  Does this explain the good range?
  Does this significantly improve the Lithium longevity?
  My 13 year old NiMHs still get ~70 miles.  But my power is uncomfortably low.

Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150612/49dfc231/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to