"EVs are much better at the high
power levels required for stabilization (though I do not see anything
preventing
the solution, other than that the spec is for a low power from the battery,
I mean 8 Amps at around 400V is not an EV power level, it is actually rather
underwhelming - I wonder why Tesla with a profile of high-power application
is releasing such a low power spec.
​"

With smart grid and many nodes you can have a bunch of smaller inputs for
the grid stabilization​.  I suspect this is the more forward thinking
approach that Tesla is nudging us towards.  SOrt of like using 7000 small
cells to run a car.

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Cor van de Water via EV <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The best (but probably also most complex = expensive) hardware
> would be to make this pack act as grid energy storage and stabilization,
> though that would not be ideal with this pack - EVs are much better at the
> high
> power levels required for stabilization (though I do not see anything
> preventing
> the solution, other than that the spec is for a low power from the battery,
> I mean 8 Amps at around 400V is not an EV power level, it is actually
> rather
> underwhelming - I wonder why Tesla with a profile of high-power application
> is releasing such a low power spec.
>
> What I think though is that it will be promoted especially as a backup
> solution
> for "when the grid goes down" and by recharging it only from your solar,
> you
> will always have power even if the grid goes out for longer periods.
> Of course you can also charge it from the grid (at night, when power cost
> may be down to ~6 cents per kWh) to replace some of the power that you
> consume
> at the highest tariff, but this will be questionable if this has a good
> business case.
> However, sometimes it is more about the feeling than the pocket book, so
> that may
> also be why they are making such a big deal out of a smallish pack of
> batteries
> not too different from what you can buy online everywhere.
> Indeed it looks like it is optimized for direct DC input from a solar
> array at a
> typical string voltage under 600V, probably the built-in DC/DC converter
> can take
> this, do MPPT (although the PowerWall specs are short on details) for
> charging
> from the sun in an optimal way - you'd only need to connect the inverter
> to get
> your humongous UPS system, which is something that I did to my EV: add a
> 3kW inverter
> and if the grid goes down, I have power for a while...
>
> Cor van de Water
> Chief Scientist
> Proxim Wireless
>
> office +1 408 383 7626                 Skype: cor_van_de_water
> XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                 private: cvandewater.info
> www.proxim.com
>
>
> This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
> proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
> this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
> unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of this
> message is prohibited.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Abramowitz
> via EV
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:34 AM
> To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] virtual power plant
>
> Not very efficient at that scale, I'm told.
>
> At you move to larger scale and longer periods of storage, other solutions
> surpass batteries.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 4, 2015, at 10:20 AM, robert winfield via EV <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > dont forget aggregating, say, 1,000 of these 10kW Powerwalls into a 10
> > megawatt virtual power plant VPP, (or any multiplier) for microgrids
> > of distributated generation
> > --------------------------------------------
> > On Fri, 5/1/15, Robert Bruninga via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tesla plugs into new market with home battery
> > system (backup foolishness)
> > To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> > Date: Friday, May 1, 2015, 9:39 PM
> >
> > Huh?  Plenty wrong with
> > your assumptions.
> >
> >> $6k
> > of golf cart batteries is about 60 of them; that's around 80 KWH of
> > storage! Who on earth needs that much for a home.
> >
> > My
> > solar panels produce typically 60 to 70 kWH every sunny day.  If I do
> > not use every bit of it every day, then I am wasting my solar
> > investment right?  Hence, I  sell it to the grid every day and buy it
> > back when I need it at no net cost..
> >
> > If I had to store it
> > in batteries (at your proposed 10% daily depth of
> > discharge) then I would need 600 kWh of batteries or $60K investment
> > (and replace it every 10 years).  Again, batteries MAKE NO ECONOMICAL
> > SENSE WHATSOEVER compared to grid-tie.
> > BUT...
> >
> > BUT, if utilities
> > began paying the homeowner the same TEN-TIMES PEAK rates they have to
> > pay for power during summer peaks, then of course, batteries coiuld
> > make some economical sense.  They don't have to handle the full
> > working load of my solar array, but only enough to meet those
> > instantaneoud peak value periods...
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EV [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Lee Hart via EV
> > Sent: Friday,
> > May 01, 2015 7:02 PM
> > To: Electric Vehicle
> > Discussion List
> > Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tesla
> > plugs into new market with home battery system
> > (backup foolishness)
> >
> > Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:
> >>> A quality GC2 golf cart battery
> > (Trojan, US Battery, etc.) is 220-240
> >>> amphours at the 20-hour rate, and
> > costs $75-$150. They are good for
> > 5-10 years, and 600-1200 discharges to 50% or so state of
> > charge.
> >>
> >> No, not
> > BOTH.  One or the other.  5-10 years just sitting there
> > doing
> >> nothing but waiting for the grid
> > to go out (4 hours a year around
> > here)...
> >
> > Correct. They are "used
> > up" once they have accumulated 600-1200 cycles,
> > *or* are 5-10 years old.
> >
> >> OR they barely will last 2 years in daily
> > solar-off-grid use (and
> >> note,  you are
> > only getting 50% of their capacity just to last that
> > long)...
> >
> > That
> > would be the case if you discharge them 50% or so every day.
> > But 50%
> > is an excessively deep discharge if
> > you're going to use them every day.
> >
> > For daily use, you would limit your depth of
> > discharge to just 10% or so.
> > Then they would
> > still last for their calendary life; 5-10 years.
> >
> > Note that life is a function
> > of depth of discharge for *all* types of
> > batteries. If you expect them to last, the
> > shallower the discharge, the
> > better.
> > You'd also murder a lithium pack in a few years, if you
> > deeply
> > discharged it every day.
> >
> > If you really have a situation
> > that requires daily deep discharges, you
> > probably have to use the old Edison nickel-iron
> > cells. Aside from quality
> > or abuse, they are
> > the only type with an indefinite cycle life.
> > (There are 100-year-old Edison cells still in
> > use).
> >
> >> Yes, may as well
> > just throw $6k in the trash every few years since you
> >> never use them.  The cost of the
> > electricity for the 4 hours average
> > outage  per year is only about 80 cents. (1 kW for 4
> > hours).  Amazing
> >> how many people will
> > spend $6k for that 80 cent problem.
> >
> > I see a pretty heavy thumb on the scale here,
> > Bob. :-) $6k of golf cart
> > batteries is about
> > 60 of them; that's around 80 KWH of storage! Who on
> > earth needs that much for a home.
> >
> > You have to select the size
> > and type of battery according to the
> > application. Some will be best served with
> > lead-acid, some nickel-iron,
> > others lithium
> > etc. Some applications aren't appropriate for batteries
> > of
> > any type.
> >
> > If all you have to cover is 4 hours of outage
> > per year, then dumb old
> > lead-acids are going
> > to be the cheapest by far. Like I said, they will die
> > of old age before you wear them out.
> >
> > --
> > Don't
> > worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are
> > any good,
> > you'll have to ram them down
> > people's throats. -- Howard Aiken
> > --
> > Lee Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377,
> > www.sunrise-ev.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> > For EV drag racing discussion, please use
> > NEDRA
> > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> > _______________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> > For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
> > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> > http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> > For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>


-- 
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk.
Thomas A. Edison
<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/thomasaed125362.html>

A public-opinion poll is no substitute for thought.
*Warren Buffet*

Michael E. Ross
(919) 585-6737 Land
(919) 576-0824 <https://www.google.com/voice/b/0?pli=1#phones> Google Phone
(919) 631-1451 Cell

[email protected]
<[email protected]>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150504/d09503f1/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to