I did this type of battery shunt test a little bit different over 50 years ago 
when I working in a military battery shop.  I apply this method to every 
battery pack I had in my EV,s.  We use a amp meter instead of a volt meter.  We 
connect a amp meter shunting a mechanical fasten battery link to the two posts 
that the link was connecting to. 

Making up a new battery pack, we first torque all the link connections to the 
same torque reading.  Turn on the battery charger and set it for a known 
ampere.  We check the amp reading of each link and find the highest ampere 
reading of one link.

Then we re-torque all the other battery connections until the amp meter reads 
the same as the highest reading.   Run a load on the batteries with a load 
bank, or in a EV, just run the EV for about 5 miles.  Do the shunt test again 
which in my EV only takes less than 15 minutes.  It is normal to find one 
battery connection at about 5 inch lbs less than the initial torque of 75 
in.lbs in my batteries.  

I than apply a thick coating of petroleum jelly to the link connection all the 
way down to the battery surface.  The batteries are enclosed in a epoxy seal 
battery box that has incoming filter air drawn in with a acid proof exhaust fan.

In about a month I will be getting three Nissen Leaf batteries which I will 
reconnect for 180 ah at 210V nominal. It is recommend to use the battery in the 
3.65V - 4.15V per cell range. Do not charge over 4.2V per cell. 

The pictures that they sent me looks like the battery links are copper which I 
assume the battery load terminals are copper too.  I am going to have to remove 
them so I can parallel three modules in parallel and series 81 of these 
parallel modules in series.   

I was planning to buff the copper bars with my metal bench mount buffer with a 
new buffer wheel, because the other ones had compound infuse into for other 
metals. 

After you polish or clean any links, it is best to wear throw away latex 
gloves, to keep the finger print oil off polish metal.  

I will then apply the petroleum jelly over these bars and connections. 

The weight of my EV which is now at 7020 lbs will weigh 5500 lbs which was 
about the original weight of the vehicle.  My 1st gear overall ratio is 25.7:1, 
2nd gear is 17.6:1, 3rd gear is 10.0:1 and 4th gear is 5.57:1.  At 7020 lbs, I 
normally use the third gear to accelerated up to either 25, 35, or 45 mph which 
is max speed in this town and 4th gear at speed drawing 75 to 125 battery amp 
and 200 to 300 motor while accelerating and 75 battery ampere or 200 motor 
ampere at 45 mph.

I try the Uve Rick's EV Calculator and its way off on the Lithium battery with 
a EV weight of 5500 lbs.  The 1st gear range is listed as 616 miles, the 2nd 
gear range is at 582 miles, the 3rd gear range is 537 miles, and the 4th gear 
range is 495 miles.  I think if you delete the last digit in each number, it 
will be closed. 

At one time we had a formula to give a estimate range or is there another range 
calculator that can be use?

Roland     
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lee Hart via EV<mailto:[email protected]> 
  To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List<mailto:[email protected]> 
  Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [EVDL] Lithium battery setpoints...


  Michael Ross wrote:
  > In air, aluminum oxide forms nearly instantly. Therefore, sanding
  > is a useless activity, if the goal is to remove aluminum oxide...

  You're right; aluminum oxide forms very quickly. However, the longer it 
  is exposed to air, the thicker the insulating layer gets. So cleaning 
  the terminal to remove the oxide immediately before assembly minimizes 
  the thickness, and thus *does* reduce the resistance.

  Very thin insulating layers behave strangely. First, the very thin oxide 
  layer is porous; it has lots of holes. Like spray painting something; 
  before you have enough paint to completely cover, you can still see the 
  underlying surface through the holes. With enough contact pressure, the 
  metal can deform in to fill these holes to make contact anyway.

  Electrons can also "tunnel" across very small gaps even when there is an 
  insulator in the way. The contact resistance doesn't go from 0 to 
  infinite as soon as there is a tiny layer of some insulator; it 
  gradually rises as the layer gets thicker.

  > I don't like the idea of sanding terminals.  You want then to have the
  > flat machined surface they have leaving the factory o get a good bolted
  > joint with as much contact area as possible...

  What you think is a flat machined surface is actually a mountain range 
  under a microscope. Machining, sanding, polishing etc. just reduces the 
  scale of the mountains.

  When the two surfaces touch, only the peaks actually make contact. 
  Increasing the contact pressure makes the metal deform, flattening the 
  peaks, and improving the contact area. The deformations also break any 
  oxide layer that may have formed, if it's thin enough and weak enough. 
  (Aluminum oxide is a tough one, because it grows strong and thick).

  If you're bolting together steel, the contact pressures needed to deform 
  it are tremendous. But lead, copper, silver, gold, and aluminum are all 
  very soft metals -- it takes a lot less contact pressure to make them 
  deform to improve the contact.

  > I suppose one might prove whether the resistance is changed for the
  > better if you have a really good instrument to check it.  But this
  > will not be your garden variety multi-meter.

  It's pretty easy to measure what's happening yourself. The test is not 
  difficult. I would urge people to try it themselves. It's especially 
  enlightening with hard-to-connect metals like aluminum.

  You need a digital multimeter with a millivolt scale (usually 200mv or 
  400mv full-scale). And, you need a source of a known DC current of an 
  amp or more. A 10-amp battery charger with a ammeter will do.

  Let's say you want to measure the resistance of the connections to a 12v 
  battery: Run the battery down, so it will actually charge at 10 amps. 
  Connect the charger at a point somewhat away from the battery, so the 
  will be current is flowing in the wires and terminals you want to check. 
  Set your meter to its millivolt scale. Connect one lead to the post of 
  the battery itself. Connect the other lead to the terminal that connects 
  to this post.

  Read the millivolt drop of the terminal, and the charging current from 
  the charger. Use Ohm's law to calculate the resistance. For example:

  R = V / I = 10 millivolts / 10 amps = 1 milliohm (0.001 ohms)

  Under normal circumstances, 0.001 ohm would be a good connection. But 
  it's a *bad* connection in an EV traction pack! At 100 amps, it would 
  have a 1 volt drop, and so produce 100 watts of heat!

  Chinese lithiums I've tested straight from the factory are this bad, and 
  sometimes worse!

  If you don't believe that cleaning, bolting, and contact "greases" help, 
  try an experiment.

  1. Get two pieces of aluminum that's been sitting around a long time.
      Bolt them together. Measure the torque if you can; if not, use a
      socket wrench and apply a "know" force.

      Measure the resistance between them (as described above). Notice
      that the tighter the bolt, the lower the resistance (to a point;
      then it doesn't matter any more).

  2. Take them apart. Clean the two surfaces with sandpaper, file,
      wire wheel, etc. Clean off any resulting dust.

      Bolt them together again, and measure the resistance again at
      several different bolt torques. You will find that the resistance
      is lower, at every bolt torque (though it still reaches a point
      where more torque doesn't reduce resistance).

  3. Add any kind of contact "grease". Noalox, axle grease, vaseline,
      etc. Repeat the test. You will find no difference in resistance,
      with or without the grease, no matter which one you use.

      But... leave the bolted pieces of aluminum outdoors for a while,
      where they will get hot/cold/wet/dirty etc. Without the grease,
      the contact resistance will go up. With the grease, it will stay
      about the same.

  This is a complex subject. I hope I have not oversimplified it too much. 
  The experts already know it, and can ignore my analogies. But I hope 
  those with only a little knowledge may gain some understanding. And, I 
  hope people will *measure it for themselves*. That's far better than 
  listening to experts debating how many electrons can dance on the head 
  of a pin. :-)
  -- 
  The definition of research: Shoot the arrow first, and paint the target
  around where it lands. -- David Van Baak
  --
  Lee Hart's EV projects are at 
http://www.sunrise-ev.com/LeesEVs.htm<http://www.sunrise-ev.com/LeesEVs.htm>
  _______________________________________________
  UNSUBSCRIBE: 
http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub<http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub>
  
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org<http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org>
  For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA>)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140731/05a8f629/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to