My suggestion would be that you open a bug in bugzilla for this if you
think there is a genuine Firefox issue here.

I've forwarded your email to some folks but received no response.

Mike

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Paul Kosinski via Enterprise <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps other users have already run into this problem with Firefox ESR
> and Pulse Audio on Linux and solved it, but I am posting this here in
> case it might be helpful.
>
> Although most software with audio output via Pulse on Linux works nicely
> in a chroot environment, Firefox (ESR) doesn't, even the pre-Quantum
> versions: No sound comes out!
>
> Apparently Firefox isn't satisfied with Pulse Audio's socket at
> "/run/pulse/native", even though I carefully made sure it was part of
> the chroot environment and had the chroot target user in the
> pulse-access group. But it *does* work if the environment variable
> "PULSE_SERVER=/run/pulse/native" is made available in the chroot
> environment. This is strange: although PULSE_SERVER is not available
> when SU-ing to the user in question, Firefox's sound works OK.
>
> I spent maybe a day reading the Firefox source code concerning audio
> (i.e., deep in the guts of the Cubeb code et al), but couldn't find
> exactly how FF connected to the socket, which apparently is used by
> Pulse to set up a shared "memfd" which is passed to the audio client.
> The FD is then *deleted* by both sides to make it inaccessible to other
> processes (some clever Unix FS trickery!).
>
> I also read some Pulse code, but that of course had no FF specific
> info. The Pulse and FF online docs aren't very helpful in this area, as
> this an obscure issue, and mainly they tell you things like "how to
> install Pulse" etc. (I did find a similar problem in some old Firejail
> posts, but no solution was indicated.)
>
> Luckily, in the course of searching online, I stumbled across the
> *existence* of the PULSE_SERVER environment variable, which I had never
> seen before, even in the online Pulse docs I read.
>
> So I tried adding it (with the obvious value) to the chroot environment
> et voila, it worked!
>
>
> Background -- why I have long used chroot for Firefox.
>
> The new versions of Firefox now have a "sandbox" which should improve
> security against bugs in various plugins etc., but older versions
> didn't. Furthermore, neither the older versions of FF nor the newer
> ones have any builtin way of totally hiding files or directories from
> Firefox beyond the limited capability of file permissions. Thus a
> minimum level of security and *privacy* would require at least running
> Firefox as a different user than the an individual with access to
> personal and business files. However, merely employing a separate user
> id doesn't hide the existence of other users, mounted disks or network
> file servers: using chroot does.
>
> Given the continual discovery of security flaws in Firefox (and other
> complex software), chroot provides an additional layer of security that
> is useful. This is especially the case given the increasing use of
> Javascript (for which I have long used NoScript) and the rise of HTTPS
> (which makes virus scanning much less possible).
>
> P.S. Although facilities like cgroups and namespaces might be better in
> the long run, I am not about to remove the protection afforded now by
> chroot while trying to get these mechanisms working.
> _______________________________________________
> Enterprise mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to
> [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
[email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to