Mike Kaply wrote: > > Share your thoughts on ESR Release Cadence > > We would love your feedback in our current cadence of Firefox > Extended Support releases. > > Today, an ESR life cycle spans between 9 months to a year. We would > like to understand if a shorter life cycle, with more releases each > year, would help meet the needs of you and your organization. > > We believe faster cycles will allow more flexibility to back port > features and functionality to the ESR and will reduce occurrence of > web app compatibility issues that arise due to the ESR being too > outdated. While the ESR helps lower QA overhead through less frequent > updates, would a biannual release bring more benefits to you? Please > chime in on this feedback form<https://forms.gle/jdwWYKQ3inqP3jwL9>. I think the current (approx) yearly major version release is about right for us
I guess if you went to (say) a 6 monthly major version release, then you would need to keep a 6 month overlap - with each major release supported for a year - i.e. always have the latest and previous release supported James Pearson _______________________________________________ Enterprise mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
