On Mar 25, 2016 5:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> To unsubscribe via the web interface, visit
>         https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
> or, via email, send a message with a subject or body of 'unsubscribe'
> to
>         [email protected]
>
> Send Enterprise mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Enterprise digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  32-bit vs. 64-bit (The Wanderer)
>    2. Re:  Fwd: Re: Fwd: NPAPI "exact" support end - will ESR52
>       still support NPAPI? (Sebastian Metzger)
>    3. Re:  Fwd: Re: Fwd: NPAPI "exact" support end - will ESR52
>       still support NPAPI? (Benjamin Smedberg)
>    4. Re:  32-bit vs. 64-bit (Dave Ewart)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:45:19 -0400
> From: The Wanderer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] 32-bit vs. 64-bit
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 2016-03-24 at 06:21, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 23.03.2016 at 13:57 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> [...] this is because there are over 4,000 open tabs, all ordinary
> >> Web pages [...]
> >
> > Wow.  Really 4000?
>
> Yes - and that's after several months of working diligently to reduce
> the count; the peak was, IIRC, 5,190.
>
> > I'm actually stunned that's manageable: how on earth do you *find* an
> > existing tab in that lot?!
>
> By separating it out into (at current count) seven different windows,
> grouped roughly by subject category, and - within each window - by
> working primarily at the head and tail of the queue, i.e., the far left
> and far right end of the tab list.
>
> I actually only have two windows whose tab count is high enough to
> overflow the window width (with minimum tab width set just barely more
> than wide enough for a favicon, via Classic Theme Restorer, and with
> maximized windows on a 2560x1600 monitor), and those two are the ones
> which I keep most stringently to their designated subject matter.
>
> It's still ridiculous, and I'm working on reducing the backlogs here,
> but it will take me quite some time to get things down to levels which
> are reasonable even by my standards. (In no small part because - with
> CTR to revert most of Australis, Session Manager for the UI it provides,
> and my currently-semi-private BarTab fork for the essential
> tab-unloading UI - having so many tabs means it takes an hour and a
> half, if not more, to shut down and restart the browser.)
>
> --
>    The Wanderer
>
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
> progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <
> https://mail.mozilla.org/private/enterprise/attachments/20160324/3fa22744/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:14:19 +0100
> From: Sebastian Metzger <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Fwd: Re: Fwd: NPAPI "exact" support
>         end - will ESR52 still support NPAPI?
> Message-ID:
>         <
> 56f3e82d.0a85c20a.24dad.ffffcf13smtpin_added_miss...@mx.google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>  > I want to understand why this is important to you. The advantages of the
>  > 64-bit version are marginal unless you're running out of address space,
>  > which is only likely to happen to a very small subset of users who are
>  > running very advanced games or 3D webapps like CAD programs in their
>  > browser.
>
> We don't wanted to use ff 64bit because of performance considerations.
>
> In our company we have Linux and windows clients.
> The used linux-distro is switching to 64bit. Because of missing 32bit
> multimedia codecs and plugins the linux admins want to use 64bit ff.
>
> We assumed, like Heiko wrote earlier before, that 64bit ff on linux and
> windows behaves the same (have NPAPI support) and therefore tried to use
> 64bit windows ff as well, to minimize differences between our linux and
> windows systems.
>
> Because of the missing NPAPI support of the 64bit windows ff we will
> stay on 32-bit for now, because we have no "real" reason for switching
> to 64bit.
> Parallelly we will try to replace all used NPAPI plugins so we are
> prepared when NPAPI support is removed from 32bit ff as well.
> And maybee we can than switch to 64bit ff on windows.
>
> And generally, why not using 64bit software on a 64bit windows?!
> Aside from the special ff case and ms office, there should be no reason
> to stay on 32bit software on a 64bit os.
>
> Aditionally we have the middle-term goal to switch from 32bit jre to
> 64bit jre and this truly because of performance improvements.
> At the moment we can't "switch" (we install both) because of the many
> java applets that are used and therefore we still need to install 32bit
> jre, to get the 32bit jre plugin for firefox. We will also try to
> replace this applets.
>
> The problem is to get replacements for all the java applets and all the
> firefox plugins. Because we are dependent on many, many different
> manufactuers.
> We hope that, if NPAPI support is dropped in RR first, many "big
> players" will begin to work on replacements and will be ready when NPAPI
> is dropped in ESR.
>
> Best regards
>
> Sebastian Metzger
>
> --
> Sebastian Metzger
>
> Debeka Krankenversicherungsverein a. G.
> Debeka Lebensversicherungsverein a. G.
> Debeka Allgemeine Versicherung AG
> Debeka Pensionskasse AG
> Debeka Bausparkasse AG
>
> Abteilung Benutzer- und Endger?tedienste (IS/BE)
> 56058 Koblenz
>
>
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Internet: www.debeka.de
>
> Besuchen Sie uns auch in sozialen Netzwerken.
> Unsere Adressen finden Sie hier: www.debeka.de/socialmedia
>
> Pflichtangaben der Debeka-Unternehmen
> gem?? ? 35a GmbHG / ? 80 AktG: www.debeka.de/pflichtangaben
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:34:32 -0400
> From: Benjamin Smedberg <[email protected]>
> To: James Pearson <[email protected]>,
>         "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Fwd: Re: Fwd: NPAPI "exact" support
>         end - will ESR52 still support NPAPI?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
>
> On 3/24/2016 7:20 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> >
> > The page at:
> >
> >
> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/
> >
> > says "we will continue to support Flash within Firefox as an exception
> to the general plugin policy"
> >
> > Will that still be the case with major releases after 52/ESR52 ?
>
> Yes.
>
> --BDS
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:01:17 +0000
> From: Dave Ewart <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] 32-bit vs. 64-bit
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Thursday, 24.03.2016 at 08:45 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> > On 2016-03-24 at 06:21, Dave Ewart wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 23.03.2016 at 13:57 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > >
> > >> [...] this is because there are over 4,000 open tabs, all ordinary
> > >> Web pages [...]
> > >
> > > Wow.  Really 4000?
> >
> > Yes - and that's after several months of working diligently to reduce
> > the count; the peak was, IIRC, 5,190.
> >
> > > I'm actually stunned that's manageable: how on earth do you *find*
> > > an existing tab in that lot?!
> >
> > By separating it out into (at current count) seven different windows,
> > grouped roughly by subject category, and - within each window - by
> > working primarily at the head and tail of the queue, i.e., the far
> > left and far right end of the tab list.
> >
> > I actually only have two windows whose tab count is high enough to
> > overflow the window width (with minimum tab width set just barely more
> > than wide enough for a favicon, via Classic Theme Restorer, and with
> > maximized windows on a 2560x1600 monitor), and those two are the ones
> > which I keep most stringently to their designated subject matter.
> >
> > It's still ridiculous, and I'm working on reducing the backlogs here,
> > but it will take me quite some time to get things down to levels which
> > are reasonable even by my standards. (In no small part because - with
> > CTR to revert most of Australis, Session Manager for the UI it
> > provides, and my currently-semi-private BarTab fork for the essential
> > tab-unloading UI - having so many tabs means it takes an hour and a
> > half, if not more, to shut down and restart the browser.)
>
> LOL!  I thought 4000 tabs was ridiculous, but 90 minutes to restart the
> browser ... "Good luck with that", as they say ;-)
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Ewart, [email protected]
> Senior IT & Information Security Manager
> Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford
> E7D2 DB06 445D 1A23 A47A  E7E2 3467 0F38 356E 6ED2
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 1513 bytes
> Desc: Digital signature
> URL: <
> https://mail.mozilla.org/private/enterprise/attachments/20160324/11d9a19b/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Enterprise mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to
> [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Enterprise Digest, Vol 57, Issue 22
> ******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
[email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to