On 9/17/2019 5:22 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: > john doe wrote on 17.09.2019 16:37: >> On 9/17/2019 3:58 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> Hi Patrick, and other enigmail folks-- >>> >>> I'm trying to sort out enigmail 2.1 for debian with tbird 68. >>> >>> i note that to properly test the new enigmail, i need a newer version of >>> jsunit for the testing, so i'd like to ship that in debian too. at >>> https://www.enigmail.net/jsunit/ i see that jsunit 0.2.2 is available. >>> >>> i notice a few things that seem amiss with jsunit distribution. I've >>> ordered them from highest priority to lowest priority as i see it -- but >>> if you can fix any of them, that would be great: >>> >>> * The git repo at https://git.code.sf.net/u/pbrunschwig/jsunit/source >>> has no tags for anything after jsunit-0.2.0, even though >>> https://www.enigmail.net/jsunit/ lists 0.2.1 and 0.2.2. >>> >>> * The git tags that i do see don't appear to be signed. Please sign >>> any new tags you create! >>> >> >> And also, signing of commit. > > No, I won't sign commits. I'm fine signing tags (like I did for years on > Enigmail), but I will not sign commits. >
Do you mind explaining why you are against signing commits? -- John Doe _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
