On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 23:25 +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > We had talked in today's engagement meeting about doing an IAMA in /r/IAMA. I > was going to do it, but I would of course prefer if we had a group of people > willing to help answer questions. I figure that we can set some ground rules > about what questions we won't answer. Although I've noticed that in these > IAMAs people tend to pick and choose anways. > > It is a new kind of engagement for sure, but it's worth trying out once and > see what the experience is. As I said I'm willing to do it, but sometimes I > don't always know what I'm talking about off the top of my head and it would > be nice if people can flag questions worth answering. > > I'm thinking I will put myself on whatever queue the IAMA people have. Let me > know what people think and whether they can help. > > sri > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > engagement-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
If I can make the time, I'm happy to help answer questions. I know a bit about GNOME history, being a 1.x -> 2.x -> 3.x "survivor". I don't get offended by hateful content on the Internet, so I can objectively decide what questions to ignore or down-vote. Logistically, if there's a few of us on the team, we might want to be on a conference call during the AMA to coordinate/discuss what questions to answer. Are there basic ground rules that the AMA subreddit enforces? ~link
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
