Le mardi 14 juin 2016 à 12:39 +0200, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > Apart from having your name in the report, if you're one of the > people in the list, this is useful when analysed, and would be even > more useful when extended. > > For example, you might want to have a list of people who don't work > for vendors to be listed, explain why some folks are high up on the > list (they're paid to work on a core component), highlight community > contributors, show that there is peer-review, that bugs are fixed > (maybe even long-standing bugs), etc. > > If it's a copy/paste of the yearly stats that the bugmasters send on > New Year's day, then it's not useful in the report except for one's > bragging rights.
That would be very cool indeed... the problem is getting someone (or an easy technique) to do the analysis without too much difficulty. Do you have something in mind? Otherwise we get either the same formula or taking it out entirely... _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
