On Tue, Feb 2, 2016, 3:29 AM Allan Day <a...@gnome.org> wrote: > Jeff F. T. <nekoh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Beyond the execution, details and visual polish, what do you folks think >> of the concept in general? >> >> And the contents? >> >> FWIW, there are also alternative ways to represent a timeline generally >> (with a circle, spiral, serpent, or some other object metaphor). Open to >> any ideas. >> > > The content seems like the most interesting thing at this stage - the > visuals and layout can be changed later. With that in mind, who is this > for? (And how will they find it?) >
I think this is really part of on boarding, when deciding what team does in the big picture. It's hard to participate in the engagement team or documentation team without really knowing what it does in the overall picture. So the infographic gives a visual clarity to absorb what we do quickly. One of the feedback I believe I heard from Nuritzi is that a lot of people had some trouble understanding what the engagement team does, as there was no context. sri > > Allan > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > engagement-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list >
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
