There are a couple minor fixup changes pending as pull requests. I really think attributing articles to authors is important: https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/pulls
On 08/02/2014 09:08 AM, Oliver Propst wrote: > Right so if I understand things correctly the Annual Report are done > and ready to be published. > > On the last Engagement team meeting [1] before GUADEC we agreed to > publish the Report the 5th of August, this Tuesday. I have scheduled a > news item for that date, this means that if we want do any last minute > changes (if necessary) it have to be done before the 5th. We also want > to create a entry on the foundation's report page [2]. If there is not > to I will upload the master copy of the report on the 5th. > > I think its really great that we have been able to produce such a > great report our limited resources. I want to thank everyone involved > especially Allan and Andreas who have done a tremendous work on the > design. With the report out of the door we are now able to focus on > ohter things which feels great. > > 1 https://wiki.gnome.org/Engagement/TeamMeetings/23-JULY-2014 > 2 http://www.gnome.org/foundation/reports/ > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Oliver Propst <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 06:49 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 23, 2014 3:13 AM, "Oliver Propst" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andreas Nilsson >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 07/17/2014 11:27 AM, Oliver Propst wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In the release article I find this sentence troubling: >>>>>> "Wayland is the next generation technology for display and input >>> on >>>>>> Linux." >>>>>> >>>>>> Its very strong wording that I don't think its an accurate, >>> description >>>>>> of the situation, sounds more like a PR statement from a company >>>>>> department, I do not think we need to play that role. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That sounds correct to me. It is the next generation tech for >>> display and >>>>> input on Linux after all. >>>>> What else would be? >>>> Its not really a matter if its *right* or wrong, but if its an >>>> accurate description of the situation. >>> >>> Seems fairly accurate, there is no other display server that has >>> gained any traction other than those related to Android and IOS. >>> >>>> >>>> I think this wording implies that there is none alternative in this >>>> area which there are [1]. We are usually quick to notice when the >>>> press treat us unfairly so I don't think we should play (or even >>> risk >>>> to) the same game. >> >>> Humm.. Mir is only associated with canonical products. The people >>> working on Wayland are more or less associated with X and is supported >>> by everyone else. >> Mir and Android still in some sense are/target *Linux*. >> >>> What alternative would you propose ? >> My suggestion are and have always been: "Wayland is a next generation >> technology for display and input on Linux". >> >> >> -- >> -mvh Oliver Propst >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
