Actually I think this can be an agenda item for next week's meeting:

* GNOME Foundation newsletter for prospective/current donors.


On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Alex G.S. <alxgrtnstr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  * Finally, we need data about our existing donors. There needs to be
>> a system where we have email and postal addresses so we can contact
>> them. We need to know how much they donate and how long they have been
>> members for. We need to know how many people are joining/leaving over
>> time. We need to know why people are joining/leaving. This will
>> require new infrastructure, and we need advice from the board about
>> what is technically required and how we can get it.
>
>
> Many non-profits especially those in the arts have opt-in newsletters.  I
> know that when I go to say, for example, the local symphony's website they
> have an email subscription box to sign up for these.  If a person donates
> or goes to a concert they automatically sign the donor up because they
> capture their email address.  I think if GNOME was to do something similar,
> and of course I could help here, we could start with one newsletter.  That
> newsletter have a broader focus than just talking about software releases
> and it should talk about the foundations activities.
>
> . One obvious thing we should be doing is
>> sending regular updates to donors, probably as an email (I wonder if
>> this could be tied in with the annual report somehow - eg. quarterly
>> donor updates could be used as the basis for each annual report).
>
>
> The newsletters should be sent frequently but not so often that they
> become annoying.  I would send a newsletter at least monthly or every two
> weeks.  That way it becomes a regular thing that the donor looks forward to.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Oliver Propst <oliver.pro...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Allan Day <allanp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Oliver Propst <oliver.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> When we are doing a campaign we tend to be very focused on it (thus
>> >> busy), and not have the resources to focus on more long term planning.
>> >>
>> >> Thus its a a good time for us now to think about how we can improve
>> >> our fundraising efforts [1]. A great start is to learn how from how
>> >> other free/open source projects have conducted their fundraising
>> >> campings.
>> > ...
>> >
>> > Thanks for getting this started, Oliver. I've been thinking about this
>> > a bit myself recently, and I'd like to do some work on Friends of
>> > GNOME if I can find the time. I wanted to discuss it in a team
>> > meeting, but the mailing list works.
>> I have added this an agenda item for the upcoming Engagement Team
>> meeting set for next week [1]
>>
>>
>> > So, some general thoughts:
>> >
>> >  * One of my main issues with Friends of GNOME right now is that we
>> > don't do enough to engage with existing donors. If people donate, the
>> > least they should get back is regular updates about how we are
>> > spending their money. Right now, Friends of GNOME is a black hole -
>> > people make their donations and that's pretty much it. This is not an
>> > effective way to encourage people to keep donating or to get them to
>> > donate more (see below). One obvious thing we should be doing is
>> > sending regular updates to donors, probably as an email (I wonder if
>> > this could be tied in with the annual report somehow - eg. quarterly
>> > donor updates could be used as the basis for each annual report).
>> >
>> >  * We ought to be looking to existing donors as the potential source
>> > of additional cash. If someone is making a regular donation, the
>> > chances are that they will also be willing to donate to periodic fund
>> > raising campaigns. This is the way a lot of charities operate - once
>> > you are a donor they will contact you about their campaigns. One thing
>> > we need to do here is separate Friends of GNOME and our fund raising
>> > campaigns into different entities.
>> >
>> >  * It doesn't seem like the adopt a hacker postcards and the t-shirts
>> > are being tracked and distributed very effectively, and I'm not
>> > convinced that we have the administrative capacity to do a good job of
>> > these. I wonder if we should drop them in favour of other incentives
>> > that don't have the same administrative burden. Ideas: discount
>> > vouchers, vouchers to spend on GNOME merchandise, freebies at
>> > conferences, membership badges you can download and print at home.
>> >
>> >  * It's time to be thinking about another campaign. When that happens,
>> > we need to be certain that we will be able to use the money fairly
>> > quickly - this hasn't happened in the past, and that is potentially
>> > damaging. (Again, people need feedback about how their money is being
>> > spent, otherwise they might not donate again.) We should think about
>> > what we actually need money for, and I'd like the board to provide us
>> > with some advice here. There are outstanding sysadmin tasks, for
>> > example, like upgrading Bugzilla, or maybe we need to improve our
>> > infrastructure in some way.
>> >
>> >  * Aside from the funding campaigns, we don't actively promote or
>> > publicise Friends of GNOME. This is a basic error - we should be
>> > routinely inviting people to join, posting about the scheme, and
>> > advertising what we are doing with donations. This should be part of
>> > the Engagement Team's regular activities - not just when we happen to
>> > have a campaign running. A good way to start here would be to come up
>> > with a plan for what kinds of posts we should be making and how often
>> > we should be making them; this is something we can check ourselves
>> > against at each team meeting.
>> >
>> >  * It seems to me that the Foundation's money goes into a central pot
>> > - I don't get the impression that particular income is earmarked for
>> > specific uses. I wonder if the finances could/should be organised in
>> > such a way that we can definitely say where Friends of GNOME money is
>> > going, or even channel it to areas that we think are more interesting
>> > to donors. Again, that's something for the board.
>> >
>> >  * Finally, we need data about our existing donors. There needs to be
>> > a system where we have email and postal addresses so we can contact
>> > them. We need to know how much they donate and how long they have been
>> > members for. We need to know how many people are joining/leaving over
>> > time. We need to know why people are joining/leaving. This will
>> > require new infrastructure, and we need advice from the board about
>> > what is technically required and how we can get it.
>>
>> These are all great points I agree with. We can elaborate more on how
>> to adress this at the next meeting.
>>
>> 1
>> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/engagement-list/2014-April/msg00054.html
>>
>> --
>> -mvh Oliver Propst
>> _______________________________________________
>> engagement-list mailing list
>> engagement-list@gnome.org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Reply via email to