Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for prepaing this document. I did not see any transport-related issues, but have a couple of general comments that might be useful to address in the next revision: 1. I would encourage expansion of DPP in the abstract to ensure that anyone scanning the abstract finds and understands the term, e.g.: Device Provisioning Protocol (DPP) 2. The following text appears before the declaration of RFC 2119 keywords: "Thus, the intention is that DPP is the RECOMMENDED mechanism for bootstrapping against Wi-Fi networks, and TLS-POK is the RECOMMENDED mechanism for bootstrapping against wired networks." - It could be that the RECOMMENDED could be lower case, since this does not describe interoperability. It could also be possible to move this text slightly later in the document. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
