FRANCISCO LOPEZ GOMEZ <[email protected]> wrote: > We have developed some POC implementations of EAP-EDHOC, including an > EAP-Peer implementation in WPA_Supplicant, an EAP-Server implementation > in HostAP and an EAP-Server implementation in FreeRADIUS. We also had a > small interoperability test with another implementation from the > University of Oviedo during the 2024 Paris Hackathon on Lightweight IoT > Security, organized by the LAKE working group > (https://parishackathon.lakewg.org/).
1. Can you contrast packet sizes over "LAN", and across "WAN" (radius
encapsulated) of EAP-EDHOC versus EAP-TLS?
2. What EDHOC modes did you implement, and were any of them using
*certificates* for client or server?
3. Were any of these implementations on class M (7228bis) devices?
What's the win here?
> Finally, if of interest to the community, our paper on EAP-EDHOC, which
> includes performance results, has just been published:
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920548925000662.
It
> will be freely available as open access in the coming days. As
> described in the paper, the method was also deployed in a real Wi-Fi
> scenario using a physical access point.
maybe answers to the above are in the paper.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
