Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Gunter Van de Velde, RTG AD, comments for draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17 Please find https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ documenting the handling of ballots. #GENERIC COMMENTS #================ 275 authentication, or a vendor-specific authentication method. Where 276 the TLS connection is authenticated, the inner method could also 277 be a PKCS exchange. can the PKCS (Public Key Cryptography Standards) be expanded upon first usage? 291 As discussed in [RFC9190] Section 2.1.7 and [RFC9427] Section 3.1, 292 the outer EAP Identity SHOULD be an anonymous NAI Network Access 293 Identifier (NAI) as descrived in [RFC7542], Section 2.4. While Twice usage of NAI in the phrase construct s/descrived/described/ 301 Any inner identities (EAP or otherwise) SHOULD also follow the 302 recommendations of [RFC9427] Section 3.1. The recommendations are slightly tucked away in RFC9427 sec3.1 Maybe the phrase should be more explicit that its about the recommendations about inner identifies from 3.1 as that section handles more as only inner identities 335 of the TEAP server, and handles the application data (inner methods, 336 EAP, passwords, etc.) inside of the TLS tunnel. Maybe my little knowledge about TEAP/EAP, but the application data mentioned here is all about security. Maybe it should be spelled out more explicit that this is data used by EAP? _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list -- emu@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to emu-le...@ietf.org