On Aug 28, 2023, at 2:18 PM, Heikki Vatiainen <h...@radiatorsoftware.com> wrote: > My colleague just pointed out that a lazy implementation can simply always > ignore EMSK and still be compliant. Would being lazy be a good reason?
With the updated text, the document says "use EMSK if it's available". So if an implementation doesn't use EMSK, it's violating the spec. Plus, all existing implementations use EMSK. So anyone who doesn't do that won't interoperate. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
