On Feb 2, 2023, at 2:26 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: a successful or failed Result TLV. > > > I suggest that this text be changed to allow a Request-Action TLV to be sent > at any time. The reasoning for this is that even with a successful TLS > exchange, the server may decide that the client needs a new certificate. > That may be due to many factors, including trust anchor changes or some sort > of compromise condition. > > Since nobody previously implemented the PKCS#10/PKCS#7 TLVs, this shouldn't > cause interoperability problems with earlier configs.
OK. I'll make that change, and issue a new document. At this point there are only a few open issues: https://github.com/emu-wg/rfc7170bis/issues Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
