On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, at 12:03, Eliot Lear wrote:
> I ask that as you consider this thread, you think beyond Basic-Auth to the
> PKCS operations.
>
I definitely am not qualified to think on this, I would be a fool to not yield
to those using those attributes!
Other than your group, is anyone aware of any other implementation of the PKCS
machinery and using it in anger?
Does the draft for RFC7170bis describe completely something that your group
implemented? Does it need your proposed CSR related TLV attribute to be
included?
Maybe worth bringing up is I have no idea what the language mentioned in
https://github.com/emu-wg/rfc7170bis/issues/8 actually does to an
implementation using these attributes; ""..in a degenerate Certificates Only
PKCS#7 SignedData Content as defined in [RFC5652]." what is 'degenerate' here
do or mean?
Cheers
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
