On Mon, 23 Jan 2023, at 14:05, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 16:24, Alan DeKok 
> <aland=40freeradius....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2023, at 8:00 PM, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote:
>> > [Joe] Speaking as a contributor, I would rather see the text deleted if 
>> > no-one plans on implementing it. This would make the document simpler.
>>
>>   If no one objects in the next week or so, I'll go do that.
>>
>>   My suggestion is to delete all text on PAC, and on related attributes.  
>> The IANA registries can remain in place, but the TLVs related to PAC can 
>> point to RFC 7170, and the other TLVs can point to this document.
>
> I also support deleting the PAC related parts. That would make it
> clearer which parts of TEAP remain in active use.

...I say we take off and nuke the entire site^WPAC from orbit. It's the only 
way to be sure.

Cheers

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to