On Jan 7, 2023, at 4:59 AM, Alexander Clouter <alex+i...@coremem.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022, at 13:48, Alan DeKok wrote: >> * perhaps mentioning TLS 1.3? > > As the PEAP and EAP-TTLS RFCs do not there probably is no need to.
Well, those were written before TLS 1.3 came out. So they discussed the most recent version of TLS. > At some stage draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types will brand an 'Updated by ...' > onto those RFCs including RFC7170bis. > > One question though is can an 'Updated by' be added to RFC7170bis if > draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types is promoted before it? No. :( There is good reason to look seriously into adding TLS 1.3 issues into 7170bis. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
