On Jan 4, 2023, at 5:09 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote:
> 
> We have discussed not adding a lot into TEAP, but it might be good to 
> consider removing some stuff. PAC tops the list of things I'd like to see 
> removed.  This is relevant to Erratum 5844 in that the example given contains 
> a PAC/PAC-Acknowledgment.  This also, has bearing on whether or not we bump 
> the TEAP version.

  I think it's best to leave it in.  We already have TLS 1.3 updates which 
remove the PAC.  That doesn't require a version update.

  Which says to me even more that we should update this document with TLS 1.3 
issues.

  Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to