On Jan 4, 2023, at 3:18 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: > > This is almost editorial. > > The TLV registry and the various registrations should now be pointed to this > document as the authority rather than RFC 7170, and we should retain the > registration policy statement for TLVs here. Frankly, specification required > is just a little thin. We probably should provide a template. We should also > leave a tombstone to indicate how the registries were formed. > > I've opened GH issue 1 on this: https://github.com/emu-wg/rfc7170bis/issues/1
I'll add some text addressing the simpler issues. As for registration policy, that will require a deeper WG discussion. I'll see if I can add a template, too. But likely not before the interim today. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
