On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 at 16:43, John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> It is always great with more privacy, but the IMSI Privacy Protection for > Wi-Fi seems a bit weird to me. Do anybody know the background and reason > behind the standard? 3GPP standardized a mechanism to encrypt IMSIs already > in 2018. I have a hard time seeing what the WBA standard adds that is not > available in the 3GPP mechanism. > This might be related to timing. When we were asked about implementing IMSI privacy done this way on the Radius server side, it was already known that some Wi-Fi clients were implementing it. In other words, maybe this had started before the 5G privacy protection method was published. Thanks, Heikki -- Heikki Vatiainen h...@radiatorsoftware.com
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
