I would like to provide comments as well. We should also bump the version of the protocol so as not to harm the existing implementations (yes, they implemented the spec with filed errata, the spec is sometimes ambiguous but those implementations are already on the market).
Regards, Oleg On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:29 AM Peter Yee <pe...@akayla.com> wrote: > This is an adoption call for RFC 7170bis > (draft-dekok-emu-rfc7170bis-00)[1]. > I'd call this mostly a formality since it's pretty clear the WG is > interested in updating TEAP and TEAP was already adopted by the WG (back in > May 2011). With Alan having generated a new working version to host the > update and even preparing a Git repository[2] to that end, I believe we're > in a good place to revise RFC 7170. That said, if anyone has an objection > to > starting off from Alan's kind offering, please let us know by December 22, > 2022. > > Joe and Peter > > 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekok-emu-rfc7170bis/ > 2) https://github.com/alandekok/rfc7170-bis.git > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
