On Feb 2, 2021, at 4:42 PM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > 4. was something I thought was clear. The -13 version states that “The > EAP-TLS server commits to not send any more handshake messages”. This was > according to my memory exactly what was requested from the implementors.
The text is in draft-mattsson-eap-tls13-02, but not in draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-00. The announcement message is here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/8Axkmgh_ZPCTwhvmRjVMvXGTKko/ Which doesn't mention the commitment message. I can't find any other discussion about the commitment message on the archive. That doesn't necessarily mean much, as the archive is difficult to search. So it's not clear where that came from. > In the last weeks discussion, the commitment message has been given a lot of > different interpretations that are not coming from the draft. The meaning of > and requirements for the -13 commitment message now seems quite unclear. An in-progress draft is not an authoritative source of information. The WG is discussing what the commitment message means, with an eye to making recommendations for the draft, and implementors. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
