On Feb 2, 2021, at 11:31 AM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Our understanding is that draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13 currently has no > possibility to progress to the RFC editor’s que. To secure a place in the RFC > editors’ que we have submitted version -14 that addresses all the comments in > the IESG Discuss. -14 uses close_notify instead of a application data > commitment message and slightly changes the exporter calls. We hope this > version will clear the remaining Discuss. The only way forward at the moment > is to publish and implement -14.
The way forward is to resolve open issues. Publishing the current draft would be premature. > Implementors have expressed a preference for draft-13, but an even stronger > preference to finalize and publish the draft. I hope the discussions will > continue during the coming weeks and at the EMU WG meeting at IETF 110 > meeting, but -14 looks like the only thing that can reach agreement to be > published at this point. IMHO we are still nowhere near agreement. There are many open questions which have not been resolved. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
