Hi Alan,
> However, in the absence of another specification, we need to say *something* > for EAP-TLS. Why doesn't the group write that other document? There are several other EAP methods that use certificates as well. >> Wouldn’t this be a topic to address in <draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert>? IMHO >> this would make more sense given that <draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert> talks >> about large certificates and long certificate chains and any proposal to >> make those even larger should be evaluated in this context. > I think that the topics are related. But draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13 is more > about the protocol, and draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert is more about deployment > considerations. The scope of draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert is whatever you want it to be. Currently, it is a mixture of deployment suggestions and the use of TLS extensions. Maybe that scope is wrong but has probably grown organically. Ciao Hannes IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
