No objections were raised against adoption of this document as a working group item. The adoption call is now closed. Alan, please submit the draft as a working group item.
We still need consensus on TEAP specifics. There are 3 issues: 1. Fixing TEAP errata: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7170 2. Specifying how TEAP should work with TLS 1.3 3. TEAP updates for BRSKI We already have a draft and active authors for 3 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-eap-teap-brski-05). We can use the virtual interim to discuss where and how the first 2 items should be addressed. Joe and Mohit On 4/20/20 1:53 AM, Mohit Sethi M wrote: > This is a call for adoption of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types/) as a > working group item. > > Please indicate if you have any objections by May 4th, 2020. > > Joe and Mohit > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
