On Dec 28, 2019, at 3:25 AM, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > The working group last call (WGLC) for this document has ended without > any objections. I ran the document through the id-nits tool and noticed > the following issues: > > - Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5296 (Obsoleted by RFC 6696)
I missed that... I'll do it in the next rev. > - rfc5448bis-04.txt is in the reference list but not cited in text. I > recommend to move the text about rfc5448bis from the abstract to the > introduction and cite the document there. Please also update the > reference to the latest version: draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06. > > Also, for PEAP, the current text says: 'A different derivation is > defined for TLS 1.3'. Can you add a reference to > draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-00 here? Done. > @Alan: > > Please submit a new version and we will send this forward to the IESG. > To expedite the process, let me already ask the following : Done. > Can you confirm if all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full > conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been > filed for draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id? I have no IPR on this document. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
