Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Before we nail this down, it seems like we need to have a discussion
> about how best to onboard wired IoT devices in particular from an
> on-prem view. The issue here is that EAP-TLS-PSK is useful for that
> purpose, as we discussed. Now there is nothing particularly special
> about PSK and we could run with a naked public key pair as well in 1.3,
> but we have to choose something.
okay, so why do you prefer PSK?
> The fundamental question is what does
> a manufacturer stamp into the device and what is placed on a label. We
> have a running example of DPP doing this for wireless with public key
> code, but that doesn’t get us to proper onboarding for wired – the
> signaling just isn’t there.
I don't understand this.
Are you saying that because it's wired, people do not expect to scan
anything?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
