On Mar 15, 2019, at 12:51 PM, slon v sobstvennom palto <slonvpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >That is probably the correct behavior to standardize, i.e., something like > >"Implementations MUST NOT set the L bit in unfragmented messages, but MUST > >accept unfragmented messages with and without the L bit set." > > I'm for the strict approach. Anyway some implementations don't adhere it. The > sentence above narrows the behaviour to a non-ambiguous while requires to > support all kinds of existing behaviours thus it looks like the most exact > form of the requirement.
I agree. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
