Sam, On 08/24/2013 03:41 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu> writes:Martin> Hi Sam, Martin> On 08/14/2013 10:16 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) <jsalo...@cisco.com> >>>>>>> writes: >> Joseph> [Joe] Retransmission and timeout behavior for EAP is Joseph> discussed in the EAP RFC 3748 Section 4.3. >> >> Echoing Joe's point, we over in abfab (draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap) >> would be really unhappy if EAP method specs started discussing >> timeouts. Martin> It is not about the EAP timeouts for whole messages, but Martin> timeouts for fragments are not defined in RFC 3748 and must Martin> be defined somewhere, as well as, what happens if timeouts Martin> are exceeded for fragments. If an inner method supports fragmentation, then each fragment is a "whole EAP message," in your terminology quoting RFC 3748.
So, for the unexperienced EAP people like me, TEAP is the inner method? TEAP is running within EAP. Martin _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
