The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5216,
"The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5216&eid=2510

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Min Pae <min....@viasat.com>

Section: 3.1

Original Text
-------------
The L bit (length included) is set to indicate the presence of the
four-octet TLS Message Length field, and MUST be set for the first
fragment of a fragmented TLS message or set of messages.

Corrected Text
--------------
The L bit (length included) is set to indicate the presence of the
four-octet TLS Message Length field, and MUST be set for the first
fragment of a fragmented TLS message.  The L bit MAY be included
in all fragments of a fragmented TLS message, but if included the
TLS Length MUST represent the entire length of the TLS message.

Notes
-----
The lack of definition for what to do with the L bit and the TLS length field 
for TLS fragments other than the first fragment is leaving the door open to 
divergent behavior for whether the L bit and length field are included, what 
the length contains if they're included, and how to interpret it.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5216 (draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol
Publication Date    : March 2008
Author(s)           : D. Simon, B. Aboba, R. Hurst
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : EAP Method Update
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to