Me too. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Stephen Hanna
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:31 PM
> To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey); Alan DeKok; emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] EMU WG Consensus call on acceptance of 
> thetunnelrequirements draft as a work item
> 
> +1
> 
> Steve 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:58 AM
> To: Alan DeKok; emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] EMU WG Consensus call on acceptance of the 
> tunnelrequirements draft as a work item
> 
> I'm in favor of accepting this document as an EMU work item.
> 
> Joe 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > Alan DeKok
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:51 AM
> > To: emu@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Emu] EMU WG Consensus call on acceptance of the tunnel 
> > requirements draft as a work item
> > 
> > This is a consensus call for acceptance of the tunnel requirements 
> > draft
> > as an EMU WG work item.   The consensus call will last 
> until June 20,
> > 2008.  Please send email to the list stating whether you 
> are in favor 
> > or opposed to accepting this document as an EMU WG work item.
> > 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-salowey-emu-eaptunnel-req-01.txt
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emu mailing list
> > Emu@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
> 
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to