Perhaps a little clarification or correction is in order here. draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0-01.txt describes EAP-TTLSv0 as it has been implemented by vendors and adopted by other SDOs. We plan to submit this for RFC status as part of the ongoing effort to document popular EAP methods as RFCs.
As I described in my presentation at EMU in Chicago, we are working on an Internet-Draft that describes a few AVPs for use with EAP-TTLSv0 that allow it to address all the requirements the EMU WG has laid out for a strong password-based method. I expect to have this Internet-Draft ready in the next week or two. As to your question about whether EAP-TTLSv0 is a chartered work item for the EMU WG, that may depend in part on how the WG decides to address the work item to deliver a strong password-based method. At the EMU WG in Chicago, there were two proposals: my proposal to use EAP-TTLSv0 with these new AVPs and another proposal to define a new EAP method especially for this purpose. The results of a hum were inconclusive and it was agreed to take this discussion to the email list. If the WG decides to use EAP-TTLSv0 to address the work item related to delivering a strong password-based method, then I think that EAP-TTLSv0 and the new AVPs would not be work items for the EMU WG but the work item would instead be the creation of a profile showing how to use EAP-TTLSv0 and the new AVPs to provide a strong password-based method. Joe, is that consistent with your current thinking? Thanks, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Tschofenig, Hannes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 7:03 AM To: Lakshminath Dondeti; emu@ietf.org Subject: AW: [Emu] Crypto-binding in TTLS-v0 Crypto-binding: Yes (my opinion) Sam also suggested to add channel bindings and to address internalization support in a proper way. Regarding your other question: No. EAP-TTLS is not a charter item since the work on password-based protocols currently does not include tunneled EAP protocols. This was discussed during the meeting. It was also mentioned that the fans of EAP-TTLS would like to publish their EAP-TTLSv0 as is -- without any modifications. Ciao Hannes > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Lakshminath Dondeti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2007 10:42 > An: emu@ietf.org > Betreff: [Emu] Crypto-binding in TTLS-v0 > > This probably has been asked before, but I will ask it in a different > context: as we try to standardize EAP-TTLS in EMU (is this a charter > item, Joe?) is there a plan to support cryto-binding in TTLS-v0? > > My opinion: well, yeah! :) > > regards, > Lakshminath > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
