Qualcomm, bleah. When they were the big cheese in feature phones they had a 
JAVA style operating system they called BREW. Binary Runtime Environment for 
Wireless.
It was completely locked down. The SDK cost money. All BREW apps had to be 
submitted to Qualcomm, the phone manufacturer, and the cell service provider. 
All had to approve the app. Apps were only downloadable from the service 
providers, for the phones they approved them to be installed on. Thus the only 
way for there to be free BREW apps was for a service provider to pay for the 
cost and offer it as a free download.
Extracting apps from phones to sideload to another was pretty much impossible, 
except maybe to another phone of the exact same model on the same provider.

Of course iPhone and Android ate BREW's lunch, dinner, and next day's 
breakfast. If Qualcomm wanted to make it big in the cellphone OS market they 
should've had a free SDK and made the OS and apps designed for portability 
using a scalable interface so an app could be written once to run on a lot of 
phones. They could've had an app store not tied to any phone manufacturer or 
service provider.

But instead they tried to act like Nintendo and other videogame companies with 
total control over their platform. Not a new thing, Texas Instruments foolishly 
tried to control all the software for their 99-4 and 99-4A computers until 
shortly before they ended it.

On Wednesday, October 8, 2025 at 08:02:40 AM MDT, Marius Liebenberg via 
Emc-users <[email protected]> wrote: 

It is less capable than the Rpi3, and the core code is not open-source. 
You run the apps through a framework. I am of the opinion it's 
Qualcomm's bid to monopolise the high-end Arduino market. They have done 
that with the GSM market very well.

It's not a very good option in my opinion. There are reviews that will 
explain just that.


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to