When using an adaptive/high speed machining tool path, make sure that the minimum radius for movement of the tool is a reasonable number (10% or more of the tool dia.).
When doing the final clearing pass you can also use plunge roughing at the corners if you cannot go to a significantly smaller diameter tool than the corner radius. > On Sep 10, 2022, at 6:33 AM, Jérémie Tarot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le sam. 10 sept. 2022 à 11:55, Nicklas SB Karlsson <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Then pocket milling with tool engagement less than tool diameter for >> some patterns tool engagement increase to tool diameter in the corners >> or ends. Anybody have anyone have any experience or knowledge how to >> handle this situation? >> > > Generally, the best option is to have a tool radius < to corner radius to > avoid having 1/4 to 1/2 of the tool engaged. > When possible my prefered strategy is rough adaptive clearing with a bigger > tool, then rough adaptive clearing of the corners with a smaller tool and > (or directly) finishing pass with the same smaller tool. > > If tool radius = corner radius, best would be some kind of adaptive path to > clear as much of material with limited engagement before the last clearing > pass. The latter ideally being slowed down both in feed and speed. > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
