This guy in Australia tested a cheap $90 100 watt panel and one that cost a lot 
more. The $90 panel significantly out performed the expensive 
panel.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-sc4rlV93g 
Commenters noted that the cheap panel is using PV cells of the newest 
technology, with all contacts on the back side and a matte finish so there's 
zero obstruction to light and the non-glossy surface reflects less light.
The expensive panel has older style cells with buss bars across the front and a 
super glossy surface.

   I wonder what $ those cheap panels are in American Dollars, if they're even 
available here. Less than $1 per watt is like when hard drive prices dropped to 
$1 a megabyte - for a 500 megabyte drive.
 
On Sunday, March 10, 2019, 3:38:07 PM MDT, Dave Matthews <[email protected]> 
wrote:  
 On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 5:15 PM Chris Albertson
<[email protected]> wrote:

> You get about 17 megawatt hours ($2800 at my current rate) from one
> $400 panel before the 20 year  warranty expires.  That is a 30% rate
> of return on the initial investment.  Itis no wonder that Telsa is
> offering to place panels on your roof for free, but they retain
> ownership of the panels.  They just want your roof.    A 30% return on
> investment look good to them.
>

I wish I could get 17 Mwh / panel over 20 years.  Based on my current
production rates I would expect about 6 Mwh per panel.  I have a 40
panel 10.4kw ground mounted array in western NY.  It is facing dead
south and is almost zero obstruction.  Production was 2016 - 13.2 Mwh,
2017 12.4 Mwh, 2018 11.7 Mwh.  Year to date is 1370 kwh.  It all comes
down to location (42.7190° N) and how much snow piles up on the panels
in the winter.  Solar is not even close to viable here.  I put it in
when it was about 60% subsidized by the state and the feds.  That made
is about a 10-11 year payback.  Our rate including delivery is
$0.10/kwh.

  
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to