On 08/28/2016 12:49 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I got that survey as an email, but when I went to supply the data asked > on the web form, I had to fill in lots more personal info than they > needed to do the survey before I could get to the rate cnc's page. That > included my unlisted phone number, age, street address etc etc. > > Huh? That screamed phishing, results to be sold to a spammer just to pay > for his time to do the survey. TANSTAAFL principle. > > So when I could not proceed, I backed out and deleted the email. If not > for that, and I hope the person doing the survey is reading this to see > just how intrusive it was seen by one LCNC user with soon to be 4 > machines running it, the count in the 'for LCNC' column would have been > one higher. Or if counting machines, 3 higher with another under > construction. > > How many of the members of this list had the same reaction? > > Hmm, I wouldn't have filled it out, either! That rather explains the sparse results.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
