On Monday 18 January 2016 11:36:47 andy pugh wrote:

> On 18 January 2016 at 16:07, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/252240794914
> >
> > But it says 0-400 hz.
>
> No it doesn't, it says
>
> "Range:0.1~2500.0Hz"

I'll look again, brb.  Humm, way down the page.  Yeah, I could 
(theoretically) go to 150,000 rpms if I could buy a suitable motor, but 
I don't believe that puppy has been invented yet. 

In any event, I bought it. But despite its showing a row of motor 
selections, I couldn't find one at that "store".  So I'll have to go 
back to trolling.

I did find an air cooled motor and a bracket and bought them too. But its 
80mm in diameter, so might be a bit difficult to mount anywhere near 
permanently. Getting it configured as a 2nd spindle might be "fun", but 
that bridge is not in sight yet.

Now, to go email Nick at psha.org.ru and see if he can be cajoled into 
assembling some camview-emc packages for wheezy.

I just came in from testing the charge-pump detector, and it appears it 
might just barely work in a 3.3 volt circuit, but works great on 
anything above 3.75V p-p input.  So I think I am in business for that 
function since all my I/O is 5 volts at the BoB screw terminal.

Thanks for the pointer on that Andy.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to