Am 12.01.2012 19:38, schrieb Kirk Wallace:
> On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 12:55 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 12, 2012 12:43:08 PM andy pugh did opine:
>>
>>> On 12 January 2012 07:22, gene heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Have you tried DesignSpark under Wine?
>>> Though gEDA might be a better bet, being native Linux. (I have never
>>> tried it)
>>
>> I have looked at gEDA and it shows promise, but it needs to grow some std
>> method of sizing the parts to an agreed upon std measurement method. When
>> the parts library is 100% contributor generated, no two parts seem to be
>> drawn to the same scale or orientation.
>
> If one can use it often enough to keep current, maybe once a week, I
> find gEDA much easier to use than Eagle. Eagle has an extensive library,
> but I suspect that is because it takes a PhD in Eagle to create them, so
> an interested party made sure the popular symbols were available.
To be honest i think it is quite easy to create new parts in eagle. When
i first needed it i wen through the pdf tutorial about creating new
parts. And after i made two or three parts myself it was very easy to
create new parts. :)
I agree that it isn't easy enough so that everybody can do it right
after first start. But i think most specialized programs need some time
to master it.
Ciao,
Rainer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
